Compare Common and Practice fusion - Feb 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Common or Practice fusion?

Common is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Practice fusion, and Practice fusion is rated higher (99/100) than Common (82/100). Common offers users more features (13) than Practice fusion (12).

Looking for the right Property Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Common Areas Vs. practice fusion

Common Areas: Property management software that connects your people, processes and real estate to drive business.

practice fusion: Our implementation specialists are here to give you as much personal guidance as your practice needs to successfully start using your new EHR.

Who is more expensive? Common Areas or Practice fusion?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Property Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Common Areas and Practice fusion.

Common Areas price starts at $49 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Common Areas is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Property Management software. Practice fusion price starts at $149 per provider/month , When comparing Practice fusion to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Property Management software cost.

Bottom line: Common Areas is more expensive than Practice fusion.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Common Vs. Practice fusion based on some of the most important and required Property Management features.

Common Areas: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Mobile Access, Project Management, Fixed Asset Management, IT Asset Management, Equipment Maintenance, Maintenance Management, Maintenance Scheduling, Predictive Maintenance.

Practice fusion: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Appointment Management, Charting.

Target customer size

Common Areas's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses,

Practice Fusion Medical Software serves a wide range of healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and specialists such as dermatologists, psychiatrists, and oncologists.