Compare COMPAS for Staffing and LinkedIn Talent - Mar 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - COMPAS for Staffing or LinkedIn Talent?

LinkedIn Talent is more expensive to implement (TCO) than COMPAS for Staffing, and COMPAS for Staffing is rated higher (91/100) than LinkedIn Talent (82/100). COMPAS for Staffing offers users more features (11) than LinkedIn Talent (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is COMPAS for Staffing!

Looking for the right Recruitment solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

COMPAS Technology Vs. LinkedIn

COMPAS Technology: COMPAS Technology, founded in 2008, develops industry leading cloud based recruiting and talent management software solutions for both the corporate and staffing industries. We are committed to helping professionals within the talent acquisition and management industry recruit and on-board top talent effectively and efficiently. Our intuitive and ...

LinkedIn: Founded in 2003, LinkedIn connects the world's professionals to make them more productive and successful. With more than 277 million members worldwide, including executives from every Fortune 500 company, LinkedIn is the world's largest professional network on the Internet. The company has a diversified business model with revenue coming from Tal...

Who is more expensive? COMPAS for Staffing or LinkedIn Talent?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Recruitment software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for COMPAS for Staffing and LinkedIn Talent.

COMPAS for Staffing price starts at $39.99 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 COMPAS for Staffing is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Recruitment software. LinkedIn Talent price starts at $79.99 per month , When comparing LinkedIn Talent to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Recruitment software cost.

Bottom line: LinkedIn Talent is more expensive than COMPAS for Staffing.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared COMPAS for Staffing Vs. LinkedIn Talent based on some of the most important and required Recruitment features.

COMPAS for Staffing: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Appraisal Performance, Benefits Administration, HR Management, Recruiting, Billing & Invoicing, Email Integration, Recruiting Management, Resume Database.

LinkedIn Talent: We are still working to collect the list of features for LinkedIn Talent.

Target customer size

COMPAS for Staffing serves a variety of industries, including healthcare, finance, technology, and more. and LinkedIn Talent's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business.