Compare Contractor and FieldLens - Jun 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Contractor or FieldLens?
FieldLens is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Contractor, and Contractor is rated higher (90/100) than FieldLens (83/100). FieldLens offers users more features (3) than Contractor (0).
Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Contractor Foreman Vs. FieldLens
Contractor Foreman: Contractor Foreman is the most affordable all in one project management software for your COMPUTER, PHONE, and TABLET.
FieldLens: Our goal at FieldLens is to deliver a better way for you to connect and collaborate with everyone on the jobsite. From being able to issue jobsite tasks and track field progress in realtime, to organizing project communication and delivering perfectly formatted reports, FieldLens helps your project team work smarter and faster. It wasn’t so long...
Who is more expensive? Contractor Foreman or FieldLens?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Contractor Foreman and FieldLens.
Contractor Foreman price starts at $49 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Contractor Foreman is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software. FieldLens price starts at $35 per user/month , When comparing FieldLens to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Construction software cost.
Bottom line: Contractor Foreman cost is around the same cost of FieldLens.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Contractor Vs. FieldLens based on some of the most important and required Construction features.
Contractor Foreman: We are still working to collect the list of features for Contractor Foreman.
FieldLens: RFIs/Submittals, Construction, Contract Management.
Target customer size
Contractor Foreman's typical customers include: SMBs, Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes related to the construction industry.
Compare specifications
Contractor Foreman Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Construction -> Contractor Foreman review |
Company: | Contractor Foreman |
Pricing: | starts at $49 per month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | Contractor Foreman review, Contractor Foreman pricing, Contractor Foreman alternatives |
FieldLens Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 83/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Construction -> FieldLens review |
Company: | FieldLens |
Pricing: | starts at $35 per user/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | FieldLens review, FieldLens pricing, FieldLens alternatives |
Compare features
Contractor Foreman: 0 Features
FieldLens: 3 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.