Compare CoreconLink and BuilderTREND - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 22, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - CoreconLink or BuilderTREND?

BuilderTREND is more expensive to implement (TCO) than CoreconLink, and BuilderTREND is rated higher (97/100) than CoreconLink (90/100). BuilderTREND offers users more features (18) than CoreconLink (6). There is a clear winner in this case and it is BuilderTREND!

Looking for the right Team Collaboration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Corecon Technologies Inc. Vs. BUILDERTREND SOLUTIONS, INC.

Corecon Technologies Inc.: Corecon was created with one thing in mind – increasing the efficiency of your business. Corecon's construction software suite streamlines workflow and enhances productivity from the office to the jobsite.

BUILDERTREND SOLUTIONS, INC.: BuilderTREND provides web-based home builder software to optimize communication between the builders, their customers, vendors, and subcontractors.The BuilderTREND web-based project management software empowers home builders and remodelers to provide a better building experience for their homebuyers, associates, and subcontractors. The system provi...

Who is more expensive? CoreconLink or BuilderTREND?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Team Collaboration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for CoreconLink and BuilderTREND.

CoreconLink price starts at $25 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 CoreconLink is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Team Collaboration software. BuilderTREND price starts at $99 per month , When comparing BuilderTREND to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Team Collaboration software cost.

Bottom line: CoreconLink cost is around the same cost of BuilderTREND.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared CoreconLink Vs. BuilderTREND based on some of the most important and required Team Collaboration features.

CoreconLink: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Data Analysis Tools, Project Management, Accounting Management.

BuilderTREND: Budget & Expense Management, Collaboration, Document Management, Project Management, Scheduling.

Target customer size

CoreconLink's typical customers include: SMBs, BuilderTREND is perfect for construction firms of all types as well as dimensions, from remodelers and household contractors to production home building contractors and also layout or construction business that want streamlining their building procedure and their cooperation with affiliates, buyers and subcontractors.

CoreconLink

ITQlick rating
(2.8/5)

starts at $25 per user/month

CoreconLink is a cloud-based Team Collaboration software that allows users to organize communication and documentation on an ongoing project at a central point.

Categories: Data Analysis Tools, Construction, Capital Program Management, Construction Estimating.

BuilderTREND

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $99 per month

BuilderTREND is a cloud-based construction management solution that is designed to be used by professional individuals and well as businesses in the construction industry. The software is designed with features...

Categories: SIP Clients, Construction, Construction Apps, Construction Project Scheduling, Electrician Apps.

Compare specifications

Compare features

CoreconLink: 6 Features

Basic Reports
Data Import/Export
Online Customer Support
Data Analysis Tools
Project Management
Accounting Management

BuilderTREND: 18 Features

Budget & Expense Management
Collaboration
Document Management
Project Management
Scheduling
Collaboration Management
Functions with e-Mail Systems
Mobile Access
Accounting Management
Bidding
Change Orders
Cost Management
Document Management
Electrical
Estimating
Project Management
Punch List
Scheduling
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
CoreconLink
ITQlick rating
2.8/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$25 per user/month
Functionality
17
Compare
BuilderTREND
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$99 per month
Functionality
31
Slack
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
100/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$6.67 per month
Functionality
15
Review
Dropbox
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$9.99 per month
Functionality
23
Deltek P...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
6

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.