Compare Corridor and Integrated - Apr 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Corridor or Integrated?
Corridor is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Integrated, and Integrated is rated higher (89/100) than Corridor (77/100). Corridor offers users more features (5) than Integrated (0).
Looking for the right Aviation Maintenance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Continuum Applied Technology Vs. Integrated Aviation Software
Continuum Applied Technology: CORRIDOR aviation maintenance software dramatically improves process and information flow throughout any aviation service organization
Integrated Aviation Software: We decided over 25 years ago we wanted to specialise. Aviation software is all we do. Maintenance and Engineering software is all we do. We live and breathe it, which is why we are able to write, beautifully design, develop and deliver truly integrated modules with seamless interfaces.
Who is more expensive? Corridor or Integrated Aviation Software?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Aviation Maintenance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Corridor and Integrated Aviation Software.
Corridor accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Corridor is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Aviation Maintenance software. Integrated Aviation Software accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Corridor is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Aviation Maintenance software.
Bottom line: Corridor is more expensive than Integrated Aviation Software.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Corridor Vs. Integrated based on some of the most important and required Aviation Maintenance features.
Corridor: Compliance , Inventory Management, Maintenance Scheduling, Work Order Management, Service requests.
Integrated Aviation Software: We are still working to collect the list of features for Integrated Aviation Software.
Target customer size
Corridor's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses, and Integrated Aviation Software's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Integrated Aviation Software
We decided over 25 years ago we wanted to specialise. Aviation software is all we do. Maintenance and Engineering software is all we do. We live and breathe it, which is why we are able to write, beautifully de...
Compare PricingCompare specifications
Corridor Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 77/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 10/10 - high cost |
Category: | Aviation Maintenance -> Corridor review |
Company: | Continuum Applied Technology |
Typical customers: | Medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Corridor review, Corridor pricing, Corridor alternatives |
Integrated Aviation Software Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 89/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Aviation Maintenance -> Integrated Aviation Software review |
Company: | Integrated Aviation Software |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop |
Links: | Integrated Aviation Software review, Integrated Aviation Software pricing, Integrated Aviation Software alternatives |
Compare features
Corridor: 5 Features
Integrated Aviation Software: 0 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.