Compare Dead Simple Screen Sharing and Saba - May 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 24, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Dead Simple Screen Sharing or Saba?

Dead Simple Screen Sharing is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Saba, and Saba is rated higher (93/100) than Dead Simple Screen Sharing (84/100). Saba offers users more features (6) than Dead Simple Screen Sharing (1). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Saba!

Looking for the right Conference Calling solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Dead Simple Screen Sharing Vs. Saba Centra

Dead Simple Screen Sharing: Hi I am Ali Asgher co-founder of Dead Simple Screen Sharing, I was doing a bit of research and found your website: ITQlick. I learned that you conduct reviews of software products and I would like to suggest our product for review. I think it will be a great fit for your readers. Dead Simple Screen Sharing is basically a screen sharing and...

Saba Centra: Saba (NASDAQ: SABA) enables organizations to transform the way they work by leveraging social networking capabilities and the ubiquity of mobile to empower an organization's most mission-critical assets - its people. The company provides a set of people-centric enterprise solutions to various businesses and industries worldwide. Saba delivers cloud...

Who is more expensive? Dead Simple Screen Sharing or Saba?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Conference Calling software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Dead Simple Screen Sharing and Saba.

Dead Simple Screen Sharing price starts at $9 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Dead Simple Screen Sharing is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Conference Calling software. Saba price starts at $19 per user/month , When comparing Saba to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Conference Calling software cost.

Bottom line: Dead Simple Screen Sharing is more expensive than Saba.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Dead Simple Screen Sharing Vs. Saba based on some of the most important and required Conference Calling features.

Dead Simple Screen Sharing: Chat.

Saba: LMS, Recruiting Management, Blended Learning, eLearning, Application Sharing.

Target customer size

Dead Simple Screen Sharing's typical customers include: Small businesses and start ups, Customers of the software hail from all major industries and form different walks of professional life.



Dead Simple Screen Sharing

ITQlick rating
(2.8/5)

starts at $9 per month

Dead Simple Screen Sharing is a conference calling software that enables users to set up a video conference meeting from their Chrome browser.

Categories: Video Conferencing, Chat.

Saba

ITQlick rating
(4.2/5)

starts at $19 per user/month

Saba is a web conferencing and real time collaboration solution for all businesses. The software offers a variety of real time communication and data sharing options at high speeds. It was designed and launched...

Categories: Business performance management, Conference Calling, Video Conferencing, Self-Service Portal, Business Process.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Dead Simple Screen Sharing: 1 Features

Chat

Saba: 6 Features

LMS
Recruiting Management
Blended Learning
eLearning
Application Sharing
eCommerce
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Dead Sim...
ITQlick rating
2.8/5
Score
84/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$9 per month
Functionality
3
Compare
Saba
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$19 per user/month
Functionality
29
Review
Compare
GoToMeeting
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$12 per organizer/month
Functionality
14
Skype fo...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$2 per user/month
Functionality
11
Adobe Co...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
$50 per host/month
Functionality
14

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.