Decision Lens Vs PM3

Decision Lens is more expensive to implement (TCO) than PM3, Decision Lens is rated higher (74/100) than PM3 (72/100). Decision Lens offers more features (1) to their users than PM3 (0).

Decision Lens: Decision Lens - @Decision Lens - is a collaborative decision making software company focused on simplifying complex decisions for commercial, government and pro sports teams. Our main goal is to identify the best “bang-for-the-buck” people, projects or ideas for our clients in a resource constrained environment. The company was recently named to En...

Bestoutcome: As a dedicated programme management consultancy we know how to manage change. Our project, portfolio management toolset PM3 has been designed by practitioners for practitioners. We can talk to your programme sponsors and delivery teams from a position of experience and knowledge; helping to ensure you always achieve successful outcomes.

Decision Lens price Starting from $49 per month , on a scale between 1 to 10 Decision Lens is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Project Portfolio Management software. PM3 price starts at $12 per user/month , when comparing PM3 to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Project Portfolio Management software cost.

Bottom line: Decision Lens is more expensive than PM3.

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Decision Lens Vs. PM3 based on some of the most important and required Project Portfolio Management features. Decision Lens: Ad-Hoc Analysis. PM3: We are still working to collect the list of features for PM3.