DeskTrack Vs Hubstaff (Mar 2021)
Compare Pricing
Shlomi Lavi / Mar 21, 2021
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
Bottom Line: Which is Better - DeskTrack or Hubstaff?
DeskTrack is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Hubstaff, Hubstaff is rated higher (94/100) than DeskTrack (64/100). Hubstaff offers more features (10) to their users than DeskTrack (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Hubstaff!
Looking for the right Employee Management solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
How Aryavrat Infotech compares with Hubstaff?
Aryavrat Infotech: Analyze the inefficient practices, help teams in improving working habits & keep your projects on track
Hubstaff: We provide a SAAS solution for Employee Productivity and time tracking. We specialize in servicing companies that have many virtual employees or a service related business where you must communicate hours worked to your clients. Hubstaff helps make this process automatic and accurate providing screenshots and exact detail of the work completed.
Who's more expensive? DeskTrack or Hubstaff?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Employee Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for DeskTrack and Hubstaff.
DeskTrack price starts at $29 per month , on a scale between 1 to 10 DeskTrack is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Employee Management software. Hubstaff price starts at $7 per user/month , when comparing Hubstaff to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Employee Management software cost.
Bottom line: DeskTrack is more expensive than Hubstaff.
Which software includes more/better features?
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared DeskTrack Vs. Hubstaff based on some of the most important and required Employee Management features. DeskTrack: We are still working to collect the list of features for DeskTrack. Hubstaff: Mobile Access, Billing & Invoicing, Automatic Time Capture, Hourly Employee Tracking, Multiple Pay Rates.
Target customer size
DeskTrack's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, The software is a useful solution for businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.
Compare specifications
DeskTrack Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 64/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4/5) |
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Employee Management -> DeskTrack |
| Company: | Aryavrat Infotech |
| Pricing: | starts at $29 per month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | DeskTrack review, DeskTrack pricing, DeskTrack alternatives |
Hubstaff Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 94/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.6/5) |
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Employee Management -> Hubstaff |
| Company: | Hubstaff |
| Pricing: | starts at $7 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | Hubstaff review, Hubstaff pricing, Hubstaff alternatives |
Compare features
DeskTrack: 0 Features
Hubstaff: 10 Features
Author
Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.