Shlomi Lavi / Apr 03, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
E-Works Manager is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Payzerware, and E-Works Manager is rated higher (91/100) than Payzerware (89/100).
Looking for the right Field Service solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Webpoint Solution: WebPoint Solutions is a young, dynamic and passionate team of web professionals who can design, develop and promote your website on search engines. We’re an intensely passionate and highly focused team of SEO specialists, web designers and software developers with a long experience in the field of Internet marketing, web design and software develop...
Payzer: Our company is Payzer. We’ve grown quickly because we work together and we put the customer first.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Field Service software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for E-Works Manager and Payzerware.
E-Works Manager price starts at $79 per 5 users/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 E-Works Manager is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Field Service software. Payzerware price starts at $399 per month , When comparing Payzerware to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Field Service software cost.
Bottom line: E-Works Manager is more expensive than Payzerware.
We've compared E-Works Manager Vs. Payzerware based on some of the most important and required Field Service features.
E-Works Manager: We are still working to collect the list of features for E-Works Manager.
Payzerware: We are still working to collect the list of features for Payzerware.
Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a variety of types. and Payzerware's target customer size include: SMBs.
starts at $79 per 5 users/month
E-Works Manager software is a job management solution that allows users to manage their quotes, invoices, and jobs all in one system. The solution offers a number of capabilities that include an asset managemen...
Compare Pricingstarts at $399 per month
Payzerware is a cloud-based Field Service software that allows managers to organize Custom dispatch groups based on function and segment, as well as tracking their group performance by the use of reports Dashbo...
PriceDemo| ITQlick Score: | 91/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Field Service -> E-Works Manager review |
| Company: | Webpoint Solution |
| Pricing: | starts at $79 per 5 users/month |
| Typical customers: | SMBs |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | E-Works Manager review, E-Works Manager pricing, E-Works Manager alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 89/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Field Service -> Payzerware review |
| Company: | Payzer |
| Pricing: | starts at $399 per month |
| Typical customers: | SMBs |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | Payzerware review, Payzerware pricing, Payzerware alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.