Compare eAdjudication and DMSys - Aug 2019

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - eAdjudication or DMSys?

eAdjudication is more expensive to implement (TCO) than DMSys, and DMSys is rated with the same score (62/100) as eAdjudication (62/100).

Looking for the right Clinical Trial Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Ethical GmbH Vs. SigmaSoft International

Ethical GmbH: Ethical Cloud Software Services for Data Management in Clinical Trials. Ethical supports Endpoint Adjudication, Electronic Data Capture and eCOA / ePRO Patient Diaries with the user-friendly professional software solution designed to ease the Clinical Data Management. The Cloud Software platforms are GxP / 21 CFR part 11 validated and have been des...

SigmaSoft International: SigmaSoft International is a global provider of data management software for clinical trials - DMSys. We provide high quality data management solutions complemented by the best possible service and support, all at an affordable cost. Founded in 1998 SigmaSoft International has met the challenge of developing an easy to learn, user-friendly and a...

Who is more expensive? eAdjudication or DMSys?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Clinical Trial Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for eAdjudication and DMSys.

eAdjudication accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 eAdjudication is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Clinical Trial Management software. DMSys accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 eAdjudication is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Clinical Trial Management software.

Bottom line: eAdjudication is more expensive than DMSys.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared eAdjudication Vs. DMSys based on some of the most important and required Clinical Trial Management features.

eAdjudication: We are still working to collect the list of features for eAdjudication.

DMSys: We are still working to collect the list of features for DMSys.

Target customer size

The eAdjudication software is designed for study leaders and its members, data managers and adjudication committee members in the wide-ranging industries of clinical research organizations, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, academic research organizations, and more. and DMSys's target customer size include: SMBs.