Compare eAdjudication and HORIZON LIMS - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - eAdjudication or HORIZON LIMS?

eAdjudication is more expensive to implement (TCO) than HORIZON LIMS, and HORIZON LIMS is rated higher (74/100) than eAdjudication (62/100).

Looking for the right Clinical Trial Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Ethical GmbH Vs. ChemWare

Ethical GmbH: Ethical Cloud Software Services for Data Management in Clinical Trials. Ethical supports Endpoint Adjudication, Electronic Data Capture and eCOA / ePRO Patient Diaries with the user-friendly professional software solution designed to ease the Clinical Data Management. The Cloud Software platforms are GxP / 21 CFR part 11 validated and have been des...

ChemWare: Since 1987, ChemWare (www.chemware.com) has been providing mission-critical information management solutions for many of the world's most highly automated environmental and human health & safety laboratories. Headquartered in Raleigh, NC, ChemWare is owned by Dohmen Life Science Services, an outsourced services company founded in 1858. ChemWare has...

Who is more expensive? eAdjudication or HORIZON LIMS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Clinical Trial Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for eAdjudication and HORIZON LIMS.

eAdjudication accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 eAdjudication is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Clinical Trial Management software. HORIZON LIMS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 eAdjudication is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Clinical Trial Management software.

Bottom line: eAdjudication is more expensive than HORIZON LIMS.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared eAdjudication Vs. HORIZON LIMS based on some of the most important and required Clinical Trial Management features.

eAdjudication: We are still working to collect the list of features for eAdjudication.

HORIZON LIMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for HORIZON LIMS.

Target customer size

The eAdjudication software is designed for study leaders and its members, data managers and adjudication committee members in the wide-ranging industries of clinical research organizations, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, academic research organizations, and more. and HORIZON LIMS's target customer size include: SMBs.