eBackpack Vs LAMS

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 01, 2021

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

Bottom Line: Which is Better - eBackpack or LAMS?

LAMS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than eBackpack, LAMS is rated with the same score (92/100) as eBackpack (92/100). eBackpack offers more features (2) to their users than LAMS (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is eBackpack!

Looking for the right LMS solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How eBackpack Inc. compares with LAMS Foundation?

eBackpack Inc.: eBackpack is an internet-based application suite specifically built for the needs of schools and school districts serving students, teachers, administrators, and parents. eBackpack is based on the fundamental principles of safety, control, and ease of use while providing a collaborative environment supporting assignment management, announcements...

LAMS Foundation: The LAMS Foundation is a not-for-profit organisation that manages research and development into LAMS and the concepts of Learning Design. The Foundation is based at Macquarie University, Australia as part of the Macquarie E-learning Centre Of Excellence (MELCOE), under the leadership of Professor James Dalziel (Director of MELCOE and inventor of L...

Who's more expensive? eBackpack or LAMS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of LMS software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for eBackpack and LAMS.

eBackpack price starts at $39 per user/year , on a scale between 1 to 10 eBackpack is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of LMS software. LAMS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 eBackpack is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of LMS software.

Bottom line:LAMS is more expensive than eBackpack.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared eBackpack Vs. LAMS based on some of the most important and required LMS features. eBackpack: Content Management, Custom Functionality. LAMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for LAMS.

Target customer size

eBackpack's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Private use, and LAMS's target customer size include: SMBs.

eBackpack

ITQlick rating
(4.6/5)

starts at $39 per user/year

eBackpack is a cloud-based LMS system that is tailored for K-12 educators who intend to create a completely digital classroom work across any device provided it has a working internet connection.

Categories: LMS.

LAMS

ITQlick rating
(3.5/5)

LAMS software is a web-based learning design application built to help design, manage and deliver online learning through collaborative learning activities. The software offers the tutors a highly spontaneous v...

Categories: LMS.

Compare specifications

eBackpack Specifications

ITQlick Score: 92/100
ITQlick Rating: (4.6/5)
Pricing: 4/10 - average cost
Category: LMS -> eBackpack
Company: eBackpack Inc.
Pricing: starts at $39 per user/year
Typical customers: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Private use
Platforms: Desktop
Links: eBackpack review, eBackpack pricing, eBackpack alternatives

LAMS Specifications

ITQlick Score: 92/100
ITQlick Rating: (3.5/5)
Pricing: 6/10 - average cost
Category: LMS -> LAMS
Company: LAMS Foundation
Typical customers: SMBs
Platforms: Desktop, Cloud
Links: LAMS review, LAMS pricing, LAMS alternatives

Compare features

eBackpack: 2 Features

Content Management
Custom Functionality

LAMS: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
eBackpack
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
4.4/10
License pricing
$39 per user/year
Functionality
3
Compare
LAMS
ITQlick rating
3.5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Review
Coassemble
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
$9 per month
Functionality
4
Coggno
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6.6/10
License pricing
$16.74 per license
Functionality
16
Review
Finalsite
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
$3,000 per license
Functionality
3
Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.