Compare eClinicalWorks and WRS Health - Feb 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 17, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - eClinicalWorks or WRS Health?

WRS Health is more expensive to implement (TCO) than eClinicalWorks, and eClinicalWorks is rated higher (97/100) than WRS Health (83/100). WRS Health offers users more features (10) than eClinicalWorks (8).

Looking for the right Medical solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

eClinicalWorks Vs. WRS Health

eClinicalWorks: eClinicalWorks is a privately-held, leader in ambulatory clinical solutions. Its technology extends the use of electronic health records beyond practice walls and creates community-wide records. The company has an established customer base of more than 80,000 physicians and 472,000 plus medical professionals across all 50 states with revenues for 2...

WRS Health: WRS Health has been helping practices streamline their clinical and workflow processes and achieve their business goals for more than 10 years. We are a profitable, privately held company headquartered in Goshen, NY. Our growth has been fueled by our innovative web-based solutions and our dedication to ensuring each client’s success through ...

Who is more expensive? eClinicalWorks or WRS Health?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for eClinicalWorks and WRS Health.

eClinicalWorks price starts at $449 per provider/month + 2.9% of practice collections , On a scale between 1 to 10 eClinicalWorks is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Medical software. WRS Health price starts at $299 per user/month , When comparing WRS Health to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Medical software cost.

Bottom line: WRS Health is more expensive than eClinicalWorks.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared eClinicalWorks Vs. WRS Health based on some of the most important and required Medical features.

eClinicalWorks: Appointment Management, Charting, E-Prescribing, E/M Coding, Handwriting Recognition, HIPAA Compliant, Patient portal, Voice Recognition.

WRS Health: Medical Claims Search, Compliance , Appointment Management, Charting, E-Prescribing.

Target customer size

eClinicalWorks is a medical software solution that serves a wide range of healthcare providers, including hospitals, clinics, and private practices. WRS Health is suitable for clinician, practice administrators and biller/RCM and supports a wide range of specialty including cardiology, internal medicine, neurology, pain management, physical therapy, urology and urgent care.



eClinicalWorks

ITQlick rating
(3.4/5)

starts at $449 per provider/month + 2.9% of practice collections

eClinicalWorks is a practice management solution for healthcare providers. The solution offers a number of features that include a patient engagement tool that allows patients to engage better with their own he...

Categories: Medical, Allergy EMR, Cardiology EMR, CCHIT Certified EMR / EHR.

WRS Health

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $299 per user/month

WRS Health software an integrated, cloud-based EHR (electronic health records), practice management, billing, and revenue cycle management system. The platform is built to help medical practices and specialties...

Categories: Payment Processing, Compliance , Medical, Claims Management, E-Prescribing.

Compare specifications

Compare features

eClinicalWorks: 8 Features

Appointment Management
Charting
E-Prescribing
E/M Coding
Handwriting Recognition
HIPAA Compliant
Patient portal
Voice Recognition

WRS Health: 10 Features

Medical Claims Search
Compliance
Appointment Management
Charting
E-Prescribing
E/M Coding
Handwriting Recognition
HIPAA Compliant
Voice Recognition
Medical
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
eClinicalWorks
ITQlick rating
3.4/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
5.2/10
License pricing
$449 per provider/month + 2.9% of practice collections
Functionality
41
Compare
WRS Heal...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
83/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
$299 per user/month
Functionality
24
NextGen ...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$299 per provider/month
Functionality
20
Practice...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$149 per provider/month
Functionality
41
WebPT
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$3 per provider/day
Functionality
30
Review

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.