Eclipse Vs HARP (Sep 2020)
Compare Pricing
Shlomi Lavi / Sep 15, 2020
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
HARP
HARP (Health Accounts Receivable Processor) is a cloud-hosted and on-premise medical billing platform that is built to support small and medium-sized medical practices. The software is tailored to handle the bi...
Compare PricingCompare specifications
Eclipse Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 87/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.6/5) |
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Medical Billing -> Eclipse |
| Company: | MPN Software Systems |
| Pricing: | starts at $19,000 per license |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Eclipse review, Eclipse pricing, Eclipse alternatives |
HARP Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (5/5) |
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Medical Billing -> HARP |
| Company: | Quadax |
| Typical customers: | SMBs |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | HARP review, HARP pricing, HARP alternatives |
Compare features
Eclipse: 8 Features
HARP: 0 Features
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Eclipse or HARP?
HARP is more expensive to implement (TCO - Total Cost of Ownership) than Eclipse, HARP is rated higher (92/100) than Eclipse (87/100). Eclipse offers more features (8) to their users than HARP (0).
Looking for the right Medical Billing solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
How MPN Software Systems compares with Quadax?
MPN Software Systems : ...
Quadax: From the very beginning, Quadax has embraced innovation. The quest for new technologies, process improvements, and superior customer service has been a driving force since our founding in 1973. Although the healthcare billing industry has undergone staggering changes over the last forty years, Quadax has continued to thrive because we understand wh...
Who's more expensive? Eclipse or HARP?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical Billing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Eclipse and HARP.
Eclipse price starts at $19,000 per license , on a scale between 1 to 10 ECLIPSE Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical Billing software. HARP accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 ECLIPSE Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical Billing software.
Bottom line:HARP is more expensive than Eclipse.
Which software includes more/better features?
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Eclipse Vs. HARP based on some of the most important and required Medical Billing features. Eclipse: Customizable Reporting, Email integration, Billing & Invoicing, Inventory Management, Appointment Management, E-Prescribing, HIPAA Compliant, Patient portal. HARP: We are still working to collect the list of features for HARP.
Target customer size
The software is a viable solution for medical practices and businesses of all sizes. and HARP's target customer size include: SMBs.
Author
Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.