Shlomi Lavi / Sep 02, 2020
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
Starting from $49 per month
EDIinsight is an on-premise medical billing solution that is developed to work in all types of hospitals and clinics and the size does not matter because it can work in practices of all sizes. the software hel...
Compare Pricing
Categories: Payment Processing, Data Management, Claims Management, Medical Billing.
ITQlick rating
HARP (Health Accounts Receivable Processor) is a cloud-hosted and on-premise medical billing platform that is built to support small and medium-sized medical practices. The software is tailored to handle the bi...
Compare Pricing
Categories: Document Management, Billing Management, Medical Billing, Patient Billing Estimate, Patient Records.
Compare specifications
EDIinsight Specifications
Compare features
EDIinsight: 0 Features
We are working to collect the list of features
HARP: 0 Features
We are working to collect the information
Bottom Line: Which is Better - EDIinsight or HARP?
EDIinsight is more expensive to implement (TCO - Total Cost of Ownership) than HARP, HARP is rated higher (92/100) than EDIinsight (82/100).
Looking for the right Medical Billing solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
How Practice Insight compares with Quadax?
Practice Insight: Practice Insight’s principals have been deeply immersed in providing services to the healthcare industry since 1977. Together they founded Practice Insight in 2003. Since then the company has grown rapidly by providing fast, secure, robust, integrated EDI solutions through its industry-leading proprietary software, EDIinsightSM.
Practice Insight...
Quadax: From the very beginning, Quadax has embraced innovation. The quest for new technologies, process improvements, and superior customer service has been a driving force since our founding in 1973. Although the healthcare billing industry has undergone staggering changes over the last forty years, Quadax has continued to thrive because we understand wh...
Who's more expensive? EDIinsight or HARP?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical Billing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for EDIinsight and HARP.
EDIinsight price Starting from $49 per month , on a scale between 1 to 10 EDIinsight is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Medical Billing software. HARP accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 EDIinsight is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Medical Billing software.
Bottom line: EDIinsight cost is around the same cost of HARP.
Which software includes more/better features?
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared EDIinsight Vs. HARP based on some of the most important and required Medical Billing features. EDIinsight: We are still working to collect the list of features for EDIinsight. HARP: We are still working to collect the list of features for HARP.
Target customer size
EDIinsight's typical customers include: SMBs, and HARP's target customer size include: SMBs.