Compare ESC Service and Epicor Financial - May 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 17, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - ESC Service or Epicor Financial?

Epicor Financial is more expensive to implement (TCO) than ESC Service, and ESC Service is rated higher (89/100) than Epicor Financial (84/100). Epicor Financial offers users more features (16) than ESC Service (3).

Looking for the right Accounting & Finance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Desco, Llc Vs. Epicor Software Corporation

Desco, Llc: Owners of a HVAC company in Fort Myers, FL saw the need to incorporate technology to enable service companies to become more manageable and ultimately more profitable. And in 1980 Coastal Computer Corporation, later renamed dESCO, was founded. dESCO, LLC. is the leading developer of innovative service industry solutions supporting more than 50 indu...

Epicor Software Corporation: Our commitment to providing world-class software and innovative technologies. The global infrastructure and experience to support new companies, regional companies and global affiliates. The determination to achieve superior customer service by a very high customer satisfaction. The strength, vision and profitability in order to act as a long-term ...

Who is more expensive? ESC Service or Epicor Financial Management?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Accounting & Finance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for ESC Service and Epicor Financial Management.

ESC Service accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 ESC Service Management is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software. Epicor Financial Management price starts at $175 per user/month , When comparing Epicor Financial Management to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Accounting & Finance software cost.

Bottom line: Epicor Financial Management is more expensive than ESC Service.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared ESC Service Vs. Epicor Financial based on some of the most important and required Accounting & Finance features.

ESC Service: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Epicor Financial Management: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & Forecasting, Credit Card Processing.

Target customer size

ESC Service's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Epicor Financial Management offers end-to-end solutions and domain expertise to leading industries.

ESC Service

ITQlick rating
(4.9/5)

ESC Service Management (now FieldEdge) is a cloud-based Accounting & Finance software that enables contractors to manage their business from a unified point and deliver customer invoices online.

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Customer Service, Field Service - HVAC, Field Service - Pest Control.

Epicor Financial

ITQlick rating
(4.7/5)

starts at $175 per user/month

Epicor Financial Management Software is a cloud based software that streamlines and automates financial processes of organisations. It has a comprehensive suite of tools that support legislative requirements of...

Categories: Fixed Asset Management, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & CPM, Core Accounting, Financial reporting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

ESC Service: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support

Epicor Financial Management: 16 Features

Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Billing & Invoicing
Budgeting & Forecasting
Credit Card Processing
Fixed-Assets
Fund-Accounting
Multi-Currency
Project-Accounting
Tax compliance
Capital Asset Planning
Forecasting
Multi-Department / Project
Automatic Data Backup
Cost Analysis
Vacancy Dashboard
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
ESC Serv...
ITQlick rating
4.9/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
9
Compare
Epicor F...
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
84/100
Pricing
6.2/10
License pricing
$175 per user/month
Functionality
30
Denali B...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$1,999 per license
Functionality
16
MoneyDesktop
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
5.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
MultiCHAX
ITQlick rating
3.4/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
$99 per license
Functionality
5

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.