Compare eSUB and FACS Project Controller - Aug 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - eSUB or FACS Project Controller?
FACS Project Controller is more expensive to implement (TCO) than eSUB, and eSUB is rated higher (97/100) than FACS Project Controller (86/100). eSUB offers users more features (17) than FACS Project Controller (10). There is a clear winner in this case and it is eSUB!
Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
eSUB Vs. Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC
eSUB: About 30 years ago eSUB originated as an off shoot of a consulting firm who represented Specialty Contractors to create construction claims for retroactive payment for work they had already performed. Managing project documents back then was inefficient, subject to mistakes and omissions. The familiar way was to manually update multiple programs...
Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC : Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC (FACS) is the leading provider of cloud-based, Field Information Management Solutions for the AEC industry. The company specializes in leveraging the latest advances in wireless and tablet technologies to provide practical, user friendly solutions for industry professionals who aim to deliver construction ...
Who is more expensive? eSUB or FACS Project Controller?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for eSUB and FACS Project Controller.
eSUB accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 eSUB is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software. FACS Project Controller accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 eSUB is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software.
Bottom line: FACS Project Controller is more expensive than eSUB.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared eSUB Vs. FACS Project Controller based on some of the most important and required Construction features.
eSUB: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Mobile Access, Telephone Customer Support, Web Hosted Solution, Document Management, Resource Management, Project Collaboration, Issue Management, Project Portfolio Management.
FACS Project Controller: Document Management, Contract Management, Cost Management, Document Management, Scheduling.
Target customer size
eSUB is specifically designed for subcontractors running a small and mid-size business. FACS Project Controller is best for large enterprises and small to medium business in the AEC (architecture, engineering, and construction) industry.
FACS Project Controller
FACS (Field Automated Communication Systems) Project Controller is a cloud-based construction management software that is designed to eliminate the communication breakdown and delayed information as well as red...
Compare PricingCompare specifications
eSUB Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 97/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Construction -> eSUB review |
Company: | eSUB |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | eSUB review, eSUB pricing, eSUB alternatives |
FACS Project Controller Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 86/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Construction -> FACS Project Controller review |
Company: | Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC |
Typical customers: | Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | FACS Project Controller review, FACS Project Controller pricing, FACS Project Controller alternatives |
Compare features
eSUB: 17 Features
FACS Project Controller: 10 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.