Compare ETran and AXIUM - Apr 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - ETran or AXIUM?

ETran is more expensive to implement (TCO) than AXIUM, and ETran is rated higher (73/100) than AXIUM (50/100). AXIUM offers users more features (10) than ETran (3).

Looking for the right Payment Processing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Financial Transmission Network, Inc. Vs. AXIUM

Financial Transmission Network, Inc.: Financial Transmissions Network Inc. (FTNI) was formed out of the need for a single, user-friendly accounts receivable (A/R) application that would process all payment types, while integrating with existing back-office A/R systems. ETran powered by FTNI does all that and more.

AXIUM: ajeraComplete was designed to include the full project lifecycle for architecture and engineering firms. A single, integrated interface manages all aspects of a project with real-time project information across the firm from principals, department managers, project managers, and accountants. ajeraComplete enables your employees to focus on creating...

Who is more expensive? ETran or AXIUM?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Payment Processing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for ETran and AXIUM.

ETran accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 ETran is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Payment Processing software. AXIUM accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 ETran is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Payment Processing software.

Bottom line: ETran is more expensive than AXIUM.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared ETran Vs. AXIUM based on some of the most important and required Payment Processing features.

ETran: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

AXIUM: Document Management, Project Management, Scheduling, Accounting Management, Contract Management.

Target customer size

ETran's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Private use, The software is a good fix for all business sizes in construction and architecture business.