Compare Big Sky Facility Management and Mailgun - May 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Big Sky Facility Management or Mailgun?

Mailgun is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Big Sky Facility Management, and Big Sky Facility Management is rated higher (85/100) than Mailgun (84/100). Big Sky Facility Management offers users more features (3) than Mailgun (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Big Sky Facility Management!

Looking for the right Facilities Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Big Sky Technologies Vs. Mailgun Technologies, Inc.

Big Sky Technologies: Big Sky Technologies, Inc. is a privately held California Corporation providing hosted application software solutions for customers throughout the United States and Canada. Big Sky specializes in communication centric solutions that leverage the skills of experienced software development, hosting and services teams. Big Sky has demonstrated steady ...

Mailgun Technologies, Inc.: Powerful APIs that enable you to send, receive and track email effortlessly.Easy SMTP integration and a simple, RESTful API abstracts away the messy details of sending transactional or bulk email. Scale quickly, whether you need to send 10 or 10 million emails.

Who is more expensive? Big Sky Facility Management or Mailgun?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Facilities Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Big Sky Facility Management and Mailgun.

Big Sky Facility Management accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Facility Management is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Facilities Management software. Mailgun price starts at $35 per month , When comparing Mailgun to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Facilities Management software cost.

Bottom line: Mailgun is more expensive than Big Sky Facility Management.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Big Sky Facility Management Vs. Mailgun based on some of the most important and required Facilities Management features.

Big Sky Facility Management: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Mailgun: We are still working to collect the list of features for Mailgun.

Target customer size

Big Sky Facility Management is suitable for restaurant and retail chains. The typical users of Mailgun belongs to the small (with about 10 to 100 employees) and/or medium-sized (with about 100 to 1,000 employees) businesses and large enterprises that fully utilizes the benefits offered from the IT, web and data hosting and other related information services sector, main with the business communication and Voice over IP/VoIP.