Compare FACTIVITY and APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) - May 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - FACTIVITY or APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling)?

FACTIVITY is more expensive to implement (TCO) than APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling), and FACTIVITY is rated higher (84/100) than APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) (50/100). APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) offers users more features (9) than FACTIVITY (6).

Looking for the right Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

FACTIVITY Vs. Beas Group AG

FACTIVITY: FACTIVITY sells products that help manufacturers manage inventory better, shrink cycle time, and increase productivity. The company shipped its first totally integrated manufacturing execution system and positioned itself to take advantage of the growing manufacturing solutions marketplace. We look to the future to provide a variety of "state-o...

Beas Group AG: Beas Group AG has been the solution partner for small and medium-sized companies for over twenty years, so you can expect us to speak your language. From 2002, we have concentrated exclusively on the manufacturing and marketing of our industry solutions be.as based on SAP Business One, which is oriented to meet your special requirements. As a ...

Who is more expensive? FACTIVITY or APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling)?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FACTIVITY and APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling).

FACTIVITY price starts at $50,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 FACTIVITY is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) software. APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) price starts at $50 per month , When comparing APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) software cost.

Bottom line: FACTIVITY is more expensive than APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling).

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared FACTIVITY Vs. APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) based on some of the most important and required Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) features.

FACTIVITY: Supply Chain Planning, Manufacturing, Document Management, Enterprise Resource Planning, Budgeting & CPM, Quality Control.

APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling): HR Analytics, Workforce Management, Payroll, Attendance Tracking, Payroll.

Target customer size

FACTIVITY's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, The software is a viable product for small and medium businesses and subsidiaries and industry offices of large corporations.