Shlomi Lavi /
Oct 17, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - FieldAware or Blue Mountain RAM?
Blue Mountain RAM is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FieldAware, and FieldAware is rated higher (91/100) than Blue Mountain RAM (85/100).
Looking for the right Field Service solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
FieldAware Vs. Blue Mountain Quality Resources
FieldAware: We are re-shaping the field service industry! Our made-for-mobile, cloud-based software was designed from the ground up to provide ease of use with incredible flexibility – a combination that enables field service organizations to amaze their customers, astonish the staff and surprise the competition. Our software was architected as a mobile platfo...
Blue Mountain Quality Resources: Blue Mountain Quality Resources is the leading developer of industry standard asset management products and services—designed exclusively for the Life Sciences industry.
Founded in 1989 by bioengineer Jim Erickson, Blue Mountain offers a complete, integrated solution from set-up to installation and from training to validation for medical device,...
Who is more expensive? FieldAware or Blue Mountain RAM?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Field Service software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FieldAware and Blue Mountain RAM.
FieldAware price starts at $70 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 FieldAware is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Field Service software. Blue Mountain RAM accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 FieldAware is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Field Service software.
Bottom line: Blue Mountain RAM is more expensive than FieldAware.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared FieldAware Vs. Blue Mountain RAM based on some of the most important and required Field Service features.
FieldAware: We are still working to collect the list of features for FieldAware.
Blue Mountain RAM: We are still working to collect the list of features for Blue Mountain RAM.
Target customer size
Field aware is suitable for companies that provide services that might require on field maintenance. Customers of the software include small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises.