Shlomi Lavi /
Dec 19, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Fieldaware or Starfish CONNECT?
Fieldaware is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Starfish CONNECT, and Starfish CONNECT is rated higher (87/100) than Fieldaware (82/100). Fieldaware offers users more features (17) than Starfish CONNECT (0).
Looking for the right Booking and scheduling solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
FieldLocate Vs. Starfish Retention Solutions
FieldLocate : FieldLocate is an intuitive field service management solution that helps small to mid-sized businesses efficiently manage their field service operations, driving better business performance and reducing costs. FieldLocate automates manual, time-consuming scheduling, invoicing and recordkeeping processes so users gain real-time, end-to-end visibilit...
Starfish Retention Solutions: Starfish Retention Solutions was founded in 2007 by David Yaskin, a former Blackboard executive who believed that higher education technology companies were not doing enough to help students complete their academic goals.
In February 2015, Hobsons announced the acquisition of Starfish Retention Solutions. The Starfish Enterprise Success Platform...
Who is more expensive? Fieldaware or Starfish CONNECT?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Booking and scheduling software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Fieldaware and Starfish CONNECT.
Fieldaware price starts at $70 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 FieldLocate is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Booking and scheduling software. Starfish CONNECT price starts at $5,000 per license , When comparing Starfish CONNECT to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Booking and scheduling software cost.
Bottom line: Fieldaware is more expensive than Starfish CONNECT.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Fieldaware Vs. Starfish CONNECT based on some of the most important and required Booking and scheduling features.
Fieldaware: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Billing/Invoicing, Case Management, Customer Database, Customer Self Service Portal, Customer Service, Customer Support Tracking, Dashboards, Remote Access.
Starfish CONNECT: We are still working to collect the list of features for Starfish CONNECT.
Target customer size
Fieldaware is specifically designed for small and mid-sized companies to efficiently manage various field service operations. and Starfish CONNECT's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.