Compare FleetCycle and TracingFlight - Aug 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Aug 18, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - FleetCycle or TracingFlight?

TracingFlight is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FleetCycle, and TracingFlight is rated higher (87/100) than FleetCycle (84/100). TracingFlight offers users more features (5) than FleetCycle (4). There is a clear winner in this case and it is TracingFlight!

Looking for the right Aviation Maintenance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

EmpowerMX Vs. IXARYS

EmpowerMX: FleetCycle® has been designed to assist airlines and maintenance companies in the management of their assets including managing and satisfying maintenance requirements, planning and recording maintenance actions, and providing consistent data for reporting and analysis.

IXARYS: With more than 25 years of experience in traceability, Véronique Maurel, General Director, and Patrick Hyppolite, President, created IXARYS to develop and export their expertise.

Who is more expensive? FleetCycle Execution Suite or TracingFlight?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Aviation Maintenance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FleetCycle Execution Suite and TracingFlight.

FleetCycle Execution Suite accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 FleetCycle Execution Suite is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Aviation Maintenance software. TracingFlight accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 FleetCycle Execution Suite is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Aviation Maintenance software.

Bottom line: FleetCycle Execution Suite cost is around the same cost of TracingFlight.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared FleetCycle Vs. TracingFlight based on some of the most important and required Aviation Maintenance features.

FleetCycle Execution Suite: Maintenance Management, Maintenance Scheduling, Work Order Management, Service requests.

TracingFlight: Compliance , Maintenance Management, Maintenance Scheduling, Work Order Management, Service requests.

Target customer size

FleetCycle Execution Suite's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and TracingFlight's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.



FleetCycle Execution Suite

ITQlick rating
(3.6/5)

FleetCycle® has been designed to assist airlines and maintenance companies in the management of their assets including managing and satisfying maintenance requirements, planning and recording maintenance action...

Categories: Maintenance, Aviation Maintenance, Service requests, Work Order Management.

TracingFlight

ITQlick rating
(3.6/5)

With more than 25 years of experience in traceability, Véronique Maurel, General Director, and Patrick Hyppolite, President, created IXARYS to develop and export their expertise.

Categories: Inventory Control, Compliance , Maintenance, Aviation Maintenance, Service requests.

Compare specifications

Compare features

FleetCycle Execution Suite: 4 Features

Maintenance Management
Maintenance Scheduling
Work Order Management
Service requests

TracingFlight: 5 Features

Compliance
Maintenance Management
Maintenance Scheduling
Work Order Management
Service requests
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
FleetCycle
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
84/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
8
Compare
TracingFlight
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
87/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
11
Harris
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Review
Aeronet
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
8
Integrated
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.