Compare Flightdocs and The Asset Guardian - Jan 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jan 28, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Flightdocs or The Asset Guardian?

The Asset Guardian is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Flightdocs, and The Asset Guardian is rated higher (82/100) than Flightdocs (80/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Aviation Maintenance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Flightdocs Vs. VeroSoft Design

Flightdocs: From your maintenance team to the C-Suite, Flightdocs solves real-world business problems through innovative technology and impeccable customer service. See how Flightdocs supports each role in your aviation department and how it caters to all operational models!

VeroSoft Design: Take advantage of a complete set of reports and historical data for better decision-making and to improve overall perforamance. Intuitive maintenance Dashboard with Power BI and predefined system-generated reports.

Who is more expensive? Flightdocs or The Asset Guardian (TAG)?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Aviation Maintenance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Flightdocs and The Asset Guardian (TAG).

Flightdocs accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Flightdocs is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Aviation Maintenance software. The Asset Guardian (TAG) accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Flightdocs is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Aviation Maintenance software.

Bottom line: The Asset Guardian (TAG) is more expensive than Flightdocs.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Flightdocs Vs. The Asset Guardian based on some of the most important and required Aviation Maintenance features.

Flightdocs: Inventory Management, Maintenance Scheduling, Work Order Management, Inventory Optimization, Inventory Management.

The Asset Guardian (TAG): Forecasting & Budgeting, Barcoding, Inventory Management, Inventory Optimization, Warehouse Management.

Target customer size

Flightdocs's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and The Asset Guardian (TAG)'s target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.



Flightdocs

ITQlick rating
(4.6/5)

Flightdocs is a growing cloud-based Maintenance software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Flightdocs received a rating of 4.6 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered ...

Categories: Inventory Management Accounting, FS Work Order Management, Inventory Management, Inventory Optimization.

The Asset Guardian

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

The Asset Guardian (TAG) is a growing cloud-based Maintenance software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. The Asset Guardian (TAG) received a rating of 5 from ITQlick team. The so...

Categories: Inventory Management, Asset Tracking, Aviation Maintenance, EAM, Scheduling.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Flightdocs: 5 Features

Inventory Management
Maintenance Scheduling
Work Order Management
Inventory Optimization
Inventory Management

The Asset Guardian (TAG): 5 Features

Forecasting & Budgeting
Barcoding
Inventory Management
Inventory Optimization
Warehouse Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Flightdocs
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
80/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
14
Compare
The Asse...
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
21
Harris
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Review
Aeronet
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
8
Integrated
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.