Compare Float and Innate Resource - Jan 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jan 04, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Float or Innate Resource?

Innate Resource is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Float, and Float is rated higher (85/100) than Innate Resource (81/100). Float offers users more features (5) than Innate Resource (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Float!

Looking for the right Project Resource Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Float Vs. Innate

Float: Having worked in ad agencies big and small since the mid-2000's, our team were constantly challenged with the age-old question: who's working on what and when? With multiple projects, shifting deadlines, changing availabilities and a range of skill sets, we needed a tool that could centralize all of this information and handle a team in constant fl...

Innate: Innate is a well resourced UK based software author specializing in resource management software. We have more than twenty years’ experience of successfully developing, implementing and supporting our software. Innate is a Microsoft Certified ISV/Software Solutions Partner and a member of the Oracle Partner program - making reliable products to ...

Who is more expensive? Float or Innate Resource Manager?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Project Resource Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Float and Innate Resource Manager.

Float price starts at $6 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Float is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Project Resource Management software. Innate Resource Manager accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Float is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Project Resource Management software.

Bottom line: Innate Resource Manager is more expensive than Float.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Float Vs. Innate Resource based on some of the most important and required Project Resource Management features.

Float: Project Management, Project Budgeting, Project Billing, Cash flow/cash budget, Forecasting.

Innate Resource Manager: We are still working to collect the list of features for Innate Resource Manager.

Target customer size

Float's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Innate Resource Manager's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

Float

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $6 per user/month

Float is a resource management software designed to help firms and agencies to manage and keep track of their projects.

Categories: Budgeting & CPM, Team Collaboration, Demand Forecasting / Replenishment, Scheduling.

Innate Resource

ITQlick rating
(3.5/5)

Innate Resource is a project resource management software designed to help businesses advance their skilled resources. With the software, they can manage resource demand, handle shared spreadsheets, and adminis...

Categories: QA, Expense Tracking, Project Resource Management, Task Management, Time Tracking.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Float: 5 Features

Project Management
Project Budgeting
Project Billing
Cash flow/cash budget
Forecasting

Innate Resource Manager: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Float
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$6 per user/month
Functionality
15
Review
Compare
Innate R...
ITQlick rating
3.5/5
Score
81/100
Pricing
6.8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Hub Plan...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
2.8/10
License pricing
$7 per resource/month
Functionality
15
Compare
Moovila
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$24 per user/month
Functionality
15
Teamdeck
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
81/100
Pricing
2.8/10
License pricing
$0.90 per month
Functionality
7

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.