FOUNDATION software is construction accounting that incorporates job costing, scheduling, and project management tools and that is deployed through on-premise or through the cloud. This platform provides numero...
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Foundation is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FACS Project Controller, and Foundation is rated higher (93/100) than FACS Project Controller (86/100). FACS Project Controller offers users more features (10) than Foundation (3).
Looking for the right Patient portal solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Foundation Software: Established in 1985, Foundation Software is the author and developer of America's #1 construction accounting software, FOUNDATION for Windows. Our dedicated staff of professionals has assisted thousands of construction companies across America with the improvement of their businesses’ accounting, job costing, and financial management.One of the ...
Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC : Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC (FACS) is the leading provider of cloud-based, Field Information Management Solutions for the AEC industry. The company specializes in leveraging the latest advances in wireless and tablet technologies to provide practical, user friendly solutions for industry professionals who aim to deliver construction ...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Patient portal software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Foundation and FACS Project Controller.
Foundation accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Foundation is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Patient portal software. FACS Project Controller accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Foundation is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Patient portal software.
Bottom line: Foundation is more expensive than FACS Project Controller.
We've compared Foundation Vs. FACS Project Controller based on some of the most important and required Patient portal features.
Foundation: Document Management, Scheduling, Costing.
FACS Project Controller: Document Management, Contract Management, Cost Management, Document Management, Scheduling.
Since it’s for the construction industry, it’s an ideal choice for contractors. FACS Project Controller is best for large enterprises and small to medium business in the AEC (architecture, engineering, and construction) industry.
FOUNDATION software is construction accounting that incorporates job costing, scheduling, and project management tools and that is deployed through on-premise or through the cloud. This platform provides numero...
Compare Pricing
FACS (Field Automated Communication Systems) Project Controller is a cloud-based construction management software that is designed to eliminate the communication breakdown and delayed information as well as red...
Compare PricingITQlick Score: | 93/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 8/10 - high cost |
Category: | Patient portal -> Foundation review |
Company: | Foundation Software |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
Links: | Foundation review, Foundation pricing, Foundation alternatives |
ITQlick Score: | 86/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Construction -> FACS Project Controller review |
Company: | Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC |
Typical customers: | Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | FACS Project Controller review, FACS Project Controller pricing, FACS Project Controller alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.