Shlomi Lavi /
Dec 13, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Google Search Appliance or Staffbase?
Staffbase is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Google Search Appliance, and Staffbase is rated higher (84/100) than Google Search Appliance (53/100). Staffbase offers users more features (4) than Google Search Appliance (3).
Looking for the right Email Utilities solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Google Vs. Bananatag Systems
Google: Google Inc. is an American corporation which provides Internet-related products and services, including internet search, cloud computing, software and advertisingtechnologies.[6] Advertising revenues from AdWords generate almost all of the company's profits.
Bananatag Systems: Pulse Surveys and Social Reactions for Internal Communicators.
Who is more expensive? Google Search Appliance or Bananatag?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Email Utilities software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Google Search Appliance and Bananatag.
Google Search Appliance price starts at $1,000 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Google Search Appliance is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Email Utilities software. Bananatag price starts at $12.50 per month , When comparing Bananatag to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Email Utilities software cost.
Bottom line: Bananatag is more expensive than Google Search Appliance.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Google Search Appliance Vs. Staffbase based on some of the most important and required Email Utilities features.
Google Search Appliance: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Bananatag: Email alerts, Event Triggered Email, Email Marketing, Email.
Target customer size
Google Search Appliance is suitable for large enterprises, universities, recruitment industries and other companies that are looking for a way to make their internal search engine work as good as Google. and Bananatag's target customer size include: SMBs.