Compare Grasshopper and Big Sky Facility Management - Apr 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Apr 26, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Grasshopper or Big Sky Facility Management?

Grasshopper is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Big Sky Facility Management, and Big Sky Facility Management is rated with the same score (85/100) as Grasshopper (85/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right VoIP solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Grasshopper Inc. Vs. Big Sky Technologies

Grasshopper Inc.: Founded by two entrepreneurs, Grasshopper has been making it easier to start and grow a small business since 2003. Back then, we started as just two guys with a dream and to date have served over 100,000 entrepreneurs (and we're still growing). The Grasshopper virtual phone system helps entrepreneurs sound more professional and stay connected fr...

Big Sky Technologies: Big Sky Technologies, Inc. is a privately held California Corporation providing hosted application software solutions for customers throughout the United States and Canada. Big Sky specializes in communication centric solutions that leverage the skills of experienced software development, hosting and services teams. Big Sky has demonstrated steady ...

Who is more expensive? Grasshopper or Facility Management?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of VoIP software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Grasshopper and Facility Management.

Grasshopper price starts at $26 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Grasshopper is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of VoIP software. Facility Management accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Grasshopper is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of VoIP software.

Bottom line: Grasshopper is more expensive than Facility Management.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Grasshopper Vs. Big Sky Facility Management based on some of the most important and required VoIP features.

Grasshopper: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Facility Management: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

Mainly the software has been deployed in small and medium businesses, although it can also be used for large businesses in some cases. Big Sky Facility Management is suitable for restaurant and retail chains.



Grasshopper

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $26 per month

Grasshopper is a virtual phone and call management solution for small and medium businesses. It also offers help desk solutions and customization of the customer support. The software was designed and l...

Categories: Communications, Webinar.

Big Sky Facility Management

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

Big Sky Facility Management is a facility management solution designed to help users track, resolve, capture and manage facility issues in multiple stores. The facility management software can automatica...

Categories: Communications, Equipment Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Web-Based CMMS, Operations.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Grasshopper: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support

Facility Management: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Grasshopper
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
$26 per month
Functionality
5
Compare
Big Sky ...
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
10
RingCent...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
4.2/10
License pricing
$19.99 per user/month
Functionality
34
jive com...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
2.8/10
License pricing
$18.95 per user/month
Functionality
7
Nextiva ...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
$11.95 per user/month
Functionality
27

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.