Compare Greenhouse and Fountain - Oct 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Oct 22, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Greenhouse or Fountain?

Greenhouse is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Fountain, and Fountain is rated higher (97/100) than Greenhouse (94/100). Fountain offers users more features (8) than Greenhouse (5). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Fountain!

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Greenhouse Software Vs. Fountain

Greenhouse Software: Greenhouse is the only recruiting software designed by people who actually understand recruiting - built specifically for companies who know how important it is to hire great people. Being good at hiring isn’t a secret—hundreds of books, newsletters, and articles explain the same best practices over and over again. The thing is, it’s tough to pu...

Fountain: With Fountains automation abilities you can simply set your hiring preferences and requirements. Spend more time with candidates and less on scheduling interviews and sending reminders.

Who is more expensive? Greenhouse or Fountain?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Greenhouse and Fountain.

Greenhouse accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Greenhouse is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Fountain price starts at $49 per month , When comparing Fountain to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: Greenhouse is more expensive than Fountain.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Greenhouse Vs. Fountain based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

Greenhouse: Workflow, Recruiting, Reference Checking, Applicant Tracking, CRM.

Fountain: Workflow, Human Resources, Applicant Tracking, Document Management, Recruiting Management.

Target customer size

The software program is a sensible item for organizations of all dimensions. and Fountain's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.



Greenhouse

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

Greenhouse is a recruitment optimization and applicant tracking solution for small and medium businesses. Its capabilities include candidate management, interview management, social media integration, a...

Categories: CRM, Self-Service Portal, Applicant Tracking, Employee Management.

Fountain

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

starts at $49 per month

Fountain software is a cloud based human resource management system that is designed for businesses across different industry frontiers. The primary features of Fountain software include custom workflows and ...

Categories: Digital Signature, Document Management, Self-Service Portal, Product Lifecycle Management, Human Resources.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Greenhouse: 5 Features

Workflow
Recruiting
Reference Checking
Applicant Tracking
CRM

Fountain: 8 Features

Workflow
Human Resources
Applicant Tracking
Document Management
Recruiting Management
Resume Database
Electronic Workflow
Product Lifecycle Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Greenhouse
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
6.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
17
Compare
Fountain
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$49 per month
Functionality
21
ADP Work...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
3.6/10
License pricing
$62 per month
Functionality
18
Collage ...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$7 per user/month
Functionality
22
Bullhorn...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$99 per user/month
Functionality
18

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.