Greenhouse Vs Fountain

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Sep 08, 2021

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Greenhouse or Fountain?

Greenhouse is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Fountain, Greenhouse is rated higher (99/100) than Fountain (97/100). Fountain offers more features (8) to their users than Greenhouse (5).

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How Greenhouse Software compares with Fountain?

Greenhouse Software: Greenhouse is the only recruiting software designed by people who actually understand recruiting - built specifically for companies who know how important it is to hire great people. Being good at hiring isn’t a secret—hundreds of books, newsletters, and articles explain the same best practices over and over again. The thing is, it’s tough to pu...

Fountain: With Fountains automation abilities you can simply set your hiring preferences and requirements. Spend more time with candidates and less on scheduling interviews and sending reminders.

Who's more expensive? Greenhouse or Fountain?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Greenhouse and Fountain.

Greenhouse price starts at $6,000 per year , on a scale between 1 to 10 Greenhouse is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Fountain price starts at $49 per month , when comparing Fountain to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: Greenhouse is more expensive than Fountain.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Greenhouse Vs. Fountain based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features. Greenhouse: Workflow, Recruiting, Reference Checking, Applicant Tracking, CRM. Fountain: Workflow, Human Resources, Applicant Tracking, Document Management, Recruiting Management.

Target customer size

The software program is a sensible item for organizations of all dimensions. and Fountain's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

Greenhouse

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $6,000 per year

Greenhouse is a recruitment optimization and applicant tracking solution for small and medium businesses. Its capabilities include candidate management, interview management, social media integration, a...

Categories: CRM, Self-Service Portal, Applicant Tracking, Employee Management.

Fountain

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

starts at $49 per month

Fountain software is a cloud based human resource management system that is designed for businesses across different industry frontiers. The primary features of Fountain software include custom workflows and ...

Categories: Digital Signature, Document Management, Self-Service Portal, Product Lifecycle Management, Human Resources.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Greenhouse: 5 Features

Workflow
Recruiting
Reference Checking
Applicant Tracking
CRM

Fountain: 8 Features

Workflow
Human Resources
Applicant Tracking
Document Management
Recruiting Management
Resume Database
Electronic Workflow
Product Lifecycle Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Greenhouse
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
6.2/10
License pricing
$6,000 per year
Functionality
17
Compare
Fountain
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$49 per month
Functionality
21
HRM
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
15
Review
Collage
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$7 per user/month
Functionality
22
Bullhorn
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$99 per user/month
Functionality
18
Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.