Greenhouse Vs Qandidate.com

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Dec 11, 2021

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Greenhouse or Qandidate.com?

Greenhouse is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Qandidate.com, Greenhouse is rated higher (99/100) than Qandidate.com (62/100). Greenhouse offers more features (5) to their users than Qandidate.com (0).

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How Greenhouse Software compares with Qandidate.com?

Greenhouse Software: Greenhouse is the only recruiting software designed by people who actually understand recruiting - built specifically for companies who know how important it is to hire great people. Being good at hiring isn’t a secret—hundreds of books, newsletters, and articles explain the same best practices over and over again. The thing is, it’s tough to pu...

Qandidate.com: Qandidate.com is the free hiring solution for in-house recruiters. Build together with recruiters for recruiters, Qandidate.com offers you all the functionalities you need to source, manage and hire talent. All for free. Our refreshingly easy to use applicant tracking system ensures you have always access and insight in your talent pipeline. ...

Who's more expensive? Greenhouse or Qandidate.com?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Greenhouse and Qandidate.com.

Greenhouse price Starting from $49 per month , on a scale between 1 to 10 Greenhouse is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Qandidate.com accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 Greenhouse is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Applicant Tracking software.

Bottom line: Greenhouse is more expensive than Qandidate.com.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Greenhouse Vs. Qandidate.com based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features. Greenhouse: Workflow, Recruiting, Reference Checking, Applicant Tracking, CRM. Qandidate.com: We are still working to collect the list of features for Qandidate.com.

Target customer size

The software program is a sensible item for organizations of all dimensions. Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a diverse range of types.

Greenhouse

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

Starting from $49 per month

Greenhouse is a recruitment optimization and applicant tracking solution for small and medium businesses. Its capabilities include candidate management, interview management, social media integration, a...

Categories: CRM, Self-Service Portal, Applicant Tracking, Employee Management.

Qandidate.com

ITQlick rating
(3.6/5)

Qandidate is a web based applicant tracking and recruitment management solution for businesses of all sizes. It offers such capabilities as candidate management, job requisition and posting, resume search, and ...

Categories: Human Resources, Applicant Tracking, Recruitment, Talent Management, Social Media.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Greenhouse: 5 Features

Workflow
Recruiting
Reference Checking
Applicant Tracking
CRM

Qandidate.com: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Greenhouse
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
6.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
17
Compare
Qandidate.com
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
3.8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
6
HRM
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
15
Review
Collage
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$7 per user/month
Functionality
22
Bullhorn
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$99 per user/month
Functionality
18
Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.