Compare GrowPath and Filevine - Feb 2023
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - GrowPath or Filevine?
GrowPath is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Filevine, and Filevine is rated higher (96/100) than GrowPath (81/100). Filevine offers users more features (9) than GrowPath (6). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Filevine!
Looking for the right Legal Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
GrowPath Vs. Filevine
GrowPath: With GrowPath, we are actively engaged in research and development to provide our customers the best possible platform for case management—giving them the technology they need to leave their competition in the dust.
Filevine: Filevine lets you communicate clearly without interrupting each others workflows. Share and edit documents, assign tasks and connect calendars to stay in sync and on time.
Who is more expensive? GrowPath or Filevine?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Legal Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for GrowPath and Filevine.
GrowPath accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 GrowPath is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Legal Management software. Filevine accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 GrowPath is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Legal Management software.
Bottom line: GrowPath is more expensive than Filevine.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared GrowPath Vs. Filevine based on some of the most important and required Legal Management features.
GrowPath: Document Management, Communications, Email list management, Expense Management, Task Management, Contract Management.
Filevine: Version Control, Collaboration, Document Management, Task Management, Document Assembly.
Target customer size
GrowPath's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses,
Filevine Legal Management software is typically used by law firms, in-house legal departments, and other legal professionals.
Compare specifications
GrowPath Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 81/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Legal Management -> GrowPath review |
Company: | GrowPath |
Typical customers: | Medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | GrowPath review, GrowPath pricing, GrowPath alternatives |
Filevine Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 96/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Legal Management -> Filevine review |
Company: | Filevine |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Filevine review, Filevine pricing, Filevine alternatives |
Compare features
GrowPath: 6 Features
Filevine: 9 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.