Shlomi Lavi /
Jun 16, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - GS RichCopy 360 or Arctor File Repository?
GS RichCopy 360 is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Arctor File Repository, and GS RichCopy 360 is rated higher (78/100) than Arctor File Repository (62/100). Arctor File Repository offers users more features (3) than GS RichCopy 360 (0).
Looking for the right Backup solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
GuruSquad Vs. byteplant
GuruSquad: At GuruSquad, we don’t look at ourselves as a software driven company. We look at ourselves as a user driven company. Our end goal is not to create software. Our end goal is to solve problems, problems that users constantly experience, problems that other application companies have chosen to ignore.
byteplant: Since 2003, Byteplant has quickly gained international success and a worldwide reputation as a provider of highly effective, cost efficient and easy to use email security and email management solutions. Our software products and services are used by customers of all sizes from small businesses to large publicly listed companies and government agenc...
Who is more expensive? GS RichCopy 360 or Arctor File Repository?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Backup software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for GS RichCopy 360 and Arctor File Repository.
GS RichCopy 360 price starts at $50 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 GS RichCopy 360 is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Backup software. Arctor File Repository price starts at $103.35 per license , When comparing Arctor File Repository to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Backup software cost.
Bottom line: GS RichCopy 360 is more expensive than Arctor File Repository.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared GS RichCopy 360 Vs. Arctor File Repository based on some of the most important and required Backup features.
GS RichCopy 360: We are still working to collect the list of features for GS RichCopy 360.
Arctor File Repository: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
GS RichCopy 360's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Private use, and Arctor File Repository's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business.