Compare Harver and ProfileXT - May 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Harver or ProfileXT?

Harver is more expensive to implement (TCO) than ProfileXT, and ProfileXT is rated higher (92/100) than Harver (67/100).

Looking for the right Pre-employment Testing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

TalentPitch Vs. Profiles International

TalentPitch: Harver is a full suite candidate selection platform designed to enable innovative companies around the world to hire better, faster.

Profiles International: We provide assessment solutions that help organizations select the right people for the right job and develop them to their full potential. We assist clients throughout all phases of the employee life cycle to enhance the productivity and performance of individuals, teams, and organizations.

Who is more expensive? Harver or ProfileXT?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Pre-employment Testing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Harver and ProfileXT.

Harver accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Harver is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Pre-employment Testing software. ProfileXT accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Harver is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Pre-employment Testing software.

Bottom line: Harver is more expensive than ProfileXT.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Harver Vs. ProfileXT based on some of the most important and required Pre-employment Testing features.

Harver: We are still working to collect the list of features for Harver.

ProfileXT: We are still working to collect the list of features for ProfileXT.

Target customer size

Harver's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, The software is a viable product for businesses of all sizes with background in a variety of industries.