Compare Harvest and Attendance on Demand - Jul 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Harvest or Attendance on Demand?

Attendance on Demand is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Harvest, and Harvest is rated higher (90/100) than Attendance on Demand (82/100). Harvest offers users more features (6) than Attendance on Demand (4). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Harvest!

Looking for the right Time Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

HARVEST Vs. Attendance on Demand Inc.

HARVEST: We believe software should be useful, simple, and fast – so you can work better, get more accomplished, and make smarter decisions for your business.Harvest was founded by Danny Wen and Shawn Liu in 2006, at a small office in downtown New York City. During the years leading up to launching Harvest, we ran a web design studio called Iridesco. As our...

Attendance on Demand Inc.: Attendance on Demand is a rapidly deployed, cloud-based time and attendance system that minimizes a company’s risk and technology investment while providing advanced features for securely managing labor data. With over 30 years in the time and attendance industry, the company’s founders have evolved product offerings from mechanical time clocks to ...

Who is more expensive? Harvest or Attendance on Demand?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Harvest and Attendance on Demand.

Harvest price starts at $12 per seat/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Harvest is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software. Attendance on Demand price starts at $2 per employee/month , When comparing Attendance on Demand to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Time Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: Harvest cost is around the same cost of Attendance on Demand.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Harvest Vs. Attendance on Demand based on some of the most important and required Time Tracking features.

Harvest: Billing & Invoicing, Sales Reporting, Project Management, Time Tracking by Client, Expense Management, Project Time Tracking.

Attendance on Demand: Employee Scheduling, Offline Timesheets, Online Timesheets, Attendance Tracking.

Target customer size

The software is suitable for the time tracking needs of any business regardless of the type and size. and Attendance on Demand's target customer size include: SMBs.