Hired Vs Recruiterflow (Nov 2020)

Shlomi Lavi / Nov 05, 2020

We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.

Looking for the right Recruitment solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. in this article we compare between the 2 software products:

Vendor comparison

Hired, Inc: Hired is a career marketplace for the world's knowledge workers. Starting with in-demand tech and sales roles, we’re bringing together job seekers with the companies who want to hire them. Users on the Hired platform receive objective guidance throughout the interview process from a dedicated Talent Advocate, as well as the ability to compare new opportunities side by side so they can make their next career move with confidence. Employers get access to a hand-picked pool of candidates who are interested in new roles, as well as unmatched transparency into competing offers so they can recruit and hire with insight. The end result is an efficient, effective and enjoyable experience that’s far faster than traditional methods.

Recruiterflow: Recruiterflow captures all the candidate data from your inbox so that all the data is always there whenever you need it. Drag and drop files to upload on candidate profile Your recruiting assistant inside your inbox for maximum productivity Never search to understand the context of a conversation. It is always there!

Pricing/cost comparison

The real cost of Recruitment software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training cost, customization cost, required hardware, and the cost of maintenance & support and other related services. It's critical that you account for all of these costs to gain an understanding of the system's "total cost of ownership". We prepared a total cost calculator for Hired TCO and Recruiterflow total cost to help with the total cost of ownership calculation.

Hired price Starting from $249 per month , on a scale between 1 to 10 Hired is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Recruitment software. Recruiterflow price Starting from $69 per user/month , when comparing Recruiterflow to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Recruitment software cost.

Bottom line: Hired is more expensive than Recruiterflow.

Features and functionality

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Hired Vs. Recruiterflow based on some of the most important and required Recruitment features.
Hired: We are still working to collect the list of features of Hired. .
Recruiterflow list of features include the following: Workflow, Recruiting Management, Resume Database, Applicant Tracking, Configurable Workflow, .

Target customer size

Hired's typical customers include: Small business, Medium business, Large business, and Recruiterflow's target customer size include: Small business.