Compare HORIZON LIMS and Trialpack Designer II - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - HORIZON LIMS or Trialpack Designer II?

Trialpack Designer II is more expensive to implement (TCO) than HORIZON LIMS, and HORIZON LIMS is rated higher (74/100) than Trialpack Designer II (58/100).

Looking for the right Clinical Trial Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

ChemWare Vs. Fleximation

ChemWare: Since 1987, ChemWare (www.chemware.com) has been providing mission-critical information management solutions for many of the world's most highly automated environmental and human health & safety laboratories. Headquartered in Raleigh, NC, ChemWare is owned by Dohmen Life Science Services, an outsourced services company founded in 1858. ChemWare has...

Fleximation: Fleximation is dedicated to provide leading edge solutions and equipment purpose designed for clinical trial materials packaging. Our highly innovative products and systems are in operation with major pharmaceutical companies and service providers in Europe and the United States. The Trialpack Robotic Blister Packaging System is a highly flexible, ...

Who is more expensive? HORIZON LIMS or Trialpack Designer II?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Clinical Trial Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for HORIZON LIMS and Trialpack Designer II.

HORIZON LIMS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 HORIZON LIMS is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Clinical Trial Management software. Trialpack Designer II accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 HORIZON LIMS is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Clinical Trial Management software.

Bottom line: Trialpack Designer II is more expensive than HORIZON LIMS.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared HORIZON LIMS Vs. Trialpack Designer II based on some of the most important and required Clinical Trial Management features.

HORIZON LIMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for HORIZON LIMS.

Trialpack Designer II: We are still working to collect the list of features for Trialpack Designer II.

Target customer size

HORIZON LIMS's typical customers include: SMBs, and Trialpack Designer II's target customer size include: SMBs.