Compare HRM Direct and Attendance on Demand - Jul 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - HRM Direct or Attendance on Demand?

HRM Direct is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Attendance on Demand, and Attendance on Demand is rated with the same score (82/100) as HRM Direct (82/100). HRM Direct offers users more features (10) than Attendance on Demand (4).

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

HRM Direct Vs. Attendance on Demand Inc.

HRM Direct: Founded in Boston, MA in 2004, HRM Direct was the first true on-demand Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) provider in the HR space, and has empowered hundreds of HR & recruiting teams at small- to mid-size businesses to attract, recruit, and onboard the best talent ever since. Now in our 7th consecutive year of double-digit growth, HRM has a mature produ...

Attendance on Demand Inc.: Attendance on Demand is a rapidly deployed, cloud-based time and attendance system that minimizes a company’s risk and technology investment while providing advanced features for securely managing labor data. With over 30 years in the time and attendance industry, the company’s founders have evolved product offerings from mechanical time clocks to ...

Who is more expensive? HRM Direct or Attendance on Demand?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for HRM Direct and Attendance on Demand.

HRM Direct accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 HRM Direct is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Attendance on Demand price starts at $2 per employee/month , When comparing Attendance on Demand to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: HRM Direct cost is around the same cost of Attendance on Demand.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared HRM Direct Vs. Attendance on Demand based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

HRM Direct: Appraisal Performance, HR Management, LMS, Performance Record, Recruiting, Software Customization, Applicant Tracking, Email Notifications.

Attendance on Demand: Employee Scheduling, Offline Timesheets, Online Timesheets, Attendance Tracking.

Target customer size

HRM Direct is an exceptional suitable for HR and various other recruiting teams across all sectors, whether personal or public, particularly for retail, producing or friendliness markets, along with 3rd party recruiters or firms. and Attendance on Demand's target customer size include: SMBs.