HRM Direct Vs TribeHR (Jul 2020)

Shlomi Lavi / Jul 13, 2020

We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. in this article we compare between the 2 software products:

Vendor comparison

HRM Direct: Founded in Boston, MA in 2004, HRM Direct was the first true on-demand Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) provider in the HR space, and has empowered hundreds of HR & recruiting teams at small- to mid-size businesses to attract, recruit, and onboard the best talent ever since. Now in our 7th consecutive year of double-digit growth, HRM has a mature product line and business model with proven success in the market.HRM Direct is rapidly becoming the foundation of successful Recruiting and HR Departments with Applicant Tracking, Onboarding, and Talent Management solutions that are powerful, cost-effective, and easy-to-use. The strength of HRM’s tools and services for small- to mid-size businesses is proven by the hundreds of companies like yours nationwide & across industries that rely on HRM every day to fill jobs faster with better candidates, less paperwork, and reduced cost while meeting their compliance and reporting obligations.

TribeHR: TribeHR is an exciting development in the world of human resource management: our innovative features let your company focus more on what you do best, and less on the things that get in your way.TribeHR is a new breed of HRIS. It combines the best of HR information management with innovative social features like peer and public recognition, shared goals and values, an interactive corporate news feed, and an engaging social interface that employees love.

Pricing/cost comparison

The real cost of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training cost, customization cost, required hardware, and the cost of maintenance & support and other related services. It's critical that you account for all of these costs to gain an understanding of the system's "total cost of ownership". We prepared a total cost calculator for HRM Direct TCO and TribeHR total cost to help with the total cost of ownership calculation.

HRM Direct price Starting from $49 per month , on a scale between 1 to 10 HRM Direct is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. TribeHR price Starting from $5 per user/month , when comparing TribeHR to their competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line:TribeHR is more expensive than HRM Direct.

Features and functionality

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared HRM Direct Vs. TribeHR based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.
HRM Direct: Appraisal Performance, HR Management, LMS, Performance Record, Recruiting, Software Customization, Applicant Tracking, Email Notifications, ..
TribeHR list of features include the following: Appraisal Performance, Employee Self-Service, HR Management, Payroll, Performance Record, .

Target customer size

HRM Direct is an excellent fit for HR and other recruiting groups across all industries, whether private or public, especially for retail, manufacturing or hospitality sectors, as well as third party recruiters or agencies. TribeHR offers standard features such as applicant tracking and goal management for small and medium based companies, but may not be suited for big enterprises with hundreds of employees.