Shlomi Lavi /
Jul 04, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Hubstaff or Oracle Project Portfolio?
Oracle Project Portfolio is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Hubstaff, and Hubstaff is rated higher (94/100) than Oracle Project Portfolio (82/100). Hubstaff offers users more features (10) than Oracle Project Portfolio (7). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Hubstaff!
Looking for the right Employee Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Hubstaff Vs. Oracle Corporation
Hubstaff: We provide a SAAS solution for Employee Productivity and time tracking. We specialize in servicing companies that have many virtual employees or a service related business where you must communicate hours worked to your clients. Hubstaff helps make this process automatic and accurate providing screenshots and exact detail of the work completed.
Oracle Corporation: Oracle Corporation is a computer technology corporation that specializes in developing and marketing computer hardware systems and enterprise software products – particularly database management systems. Employing approximately 113,644 people worldwide as of 30 June 2012,it has enlarged its share of the software market through organic growth and th...
Who is more expensive? Hubstaff or Oracle Project Portfolio Management?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Employee Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Hubstaff and Oracle Project Portfolio Management.
Hubstaff price starts at $7 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Hubstaff is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Employee Management software. Oracle Project Portfolio Management price starts at $625 per license , When comparing Oracle Project Portfolio Management to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Employee Management software cost.
Bottom line: Oracle Project Portfolio Management is more expensive than Hubstaff.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Hubstaff Vs. Oracle Project Portfolio based on some of the most important and required Employee Management features.
Hubstaff: Mobile Access, Billing & Invoicing, Automatic Time Capture, Hourly Employee Tracking, Multiple Pay Rates, Project Time Tracking, Salaried Time Tracking, Sick Leave Tracking.
Oracle Project Portfolio Management: Collaboration, Document Management, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Resource Management.
Target customer size
The software is a useful solution for businesses of all sizes and a variety of types. Customers of the software hail from all major industries and include businesses of all sizes and types, although is it mainly used in large enterprise projects.