Compare Hydra PSA and FinancialForce PSA - Jul 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jul 05, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Hydra PSA or FinancialForce PSA?

FinancialForce PSA is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Hydra PSA, and Hydra PSA is rated higher (84/100) than FinancialForce PSA (82/100). FinancialForce PSA offers users more features (10) than Hydra PSA (5).

Looking for the right Professional Services Automation solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Hydra Vs. Financial Force

Hydra: At Hydra, we have 20 years of experience, and the unique project resource management software that allows us to deliver consistent solutions that you can have up and running after only one week. We offer business software that optimizes resource utilization while it drives project management standardization. The end result is greater visibility a...

Financial Force: FinancialForce.com is the cloud applications company. We focus 100% on building business applications for Force.com, the world’s leading cloud computing platform from salesforce.com. Our applications include Accounting, Billing, Professional Services Automation (PSA) and Services Resource Planning (SRP). We serve fast-growing organizations as well...

Who is more expensive? Hydra PSA or FinancialForce PSA?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Professional Services Automation software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Hydra PSA and FinancialForce PSA.

Hydra PSA accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Hydra PSA is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Professional Services Automation software. FinancialForce PSA price starts at $10 per month , When comparing FinancialForce PSA to its competitors, the software is rated 8 - higher than the average Professional Services Automation software cost.

Bottom line: FinancialForce PSA is more expensive than Hydra PSA.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Hydra PSA Vs. FinancialForce PSA based on some of the most important and required Professional Services Automation features.

Hydra PSA: Dashboard, Budgeting & Forecasting, Project Budgeting, Project Portfolio Management, Time and Expense Tracking.

FinancialForce PSA: Budget & Expense Management, Collaboration, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Resource Management.

Target customer size

The software is a flexible solution that can be deployed for the needs of any business size and type. This solution is aimed at companies that have a large number of professionals to manage, businesses that need to automate their entire process of interacting with customers and to manage their financial resources.



Hydra PSA

ITQlick rating
(2.8/5)

Hydra PSA is a professional services automation solution for businesses of all sizes. It offers project management, compliance and control, online collaboration, resource management, and other capabilities. T...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Billing & Invoicing, Time and Attendance, IT Management.

FinancialForce PSA

ITQlick rating
(4.2/5)

starts at $10 per month

FinancialForce PSA is a cloud-hosted PSA (professional services automation) solution that is native to the Salesforce Platform. The software provides users with business automation tools in the cloud through th...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, CRM, Project Collaboration, Time and Attendance, Workforce Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Hydra PSA: 5 Features

Dashboard
Budgeting & Forecasting
Project Budgeting
Project Portfolio Management
Time and Expense Tracking

FinancialForce PSA: 10 Features

Budget & Expense Management
Collaboration
Issue Tracking
Project Management
Resource Management
Scheduling
Task Management
Client Collaboration
Inventory Management
Supplier Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Hydra PS...
ITQlick rating
2.8/5
Score
84/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
18
Compare
Financia...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
9.2/10
License pricing
$10 per month
Functionality
23
Elite 3E
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
4.8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
TSheets
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$10 per month
Functionality
5
ArchiOffice
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
$7.95 per month
Functionality
18

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.