Compare instantOLAP and White Cup BI - Oct 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Oct 29, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - instantOLAP or White Cup BI?

instantOLAP is more expensive to implement (TCO) than White Cup BI, and White Cup BI is rated higher (75/100) than instantOLAP (50/100). instantOLAP offers users more features (11) than White Cup BI (8).

Looking for the right Query and Report Writer solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

SoftPro Tetral Vs. MITS

SoftPro Tetral: SoftPro Tetral is a company that is envolved in architecting and supporting information systems and building applicative solutions based on latest Microsoft's tehnologies. Our goal is to face the needs of corporative market and the most demanding users so we are developing solutions that use state-of-the-art distributed client-server architecture b...

MITS : MITS develops Advanced Reporting and Analytics software solutions for organizations that need information access and insights frequently not available from business management applications. From its inception, MITS has remained faithful to its vision: to provide relevant data in a thoughtfully constructed format, within an easy-to-access system. ...

Who is more expensive? instantOLAP or MITS Distributor Analytics?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Query and Report Writer software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for instantOLAP and MITS Distributor Analytics.

instantOLAP price starts at $550 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 instantOLAP is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Query and Report Writer software. MITS Distributor Analytics price starts at $10,000 per license , When comparing MITS Distributor Analytics to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Query and Report Writer software cost.

Bottom line: instantOLAP cost is around the same cost of MITS Distributor Analytics.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared instantOLAP Vs. White Cup BI based on some of the most important and required Query and Report Writer features.

instantOLAP: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Ad-Hoc Analysis, Ad-Hoc Reporting, Automatic Scheduled Reporting, Customizable Dashboard, Customizable Features, Dashboarding, Graphic Benchmark, Issue Indicators.

MITS Distributor Analytics: Ad-Hoc Analysis, Ad-Hoc Reporting, Automatic Scheduled Reporting, Dashboarding, Issue Indicators.

Target customer size

instantOLAP is an ideal choice for businesses in all industries and of all sizes. White Cup BI is ideal for startups, small, medium and large businesses across the US, Canada and Europe.



instantOLAP

ITQlick rating
(3.4/5)

starts at $550 per license

instantOLAP is a business intelligence software tool for online analytical processing (OLAP) designed for companies of all sizes. Its main features include reporting, adhoc analysis, document sharing, bookmarks...

Categories: BI & Analytics.

White Cup BI

ITQlick rating
(4.6/5)

starts at $10,000 per license

MITS Distributor Analytics is cloud-based and on-premise comprehensive reporting and business intelligence solutions, empowers non-technical users to make better decisions using the data that is obtained from o...

Categories: BI & Analytics, Business Intelligence, Cloud BI, Dashboards & KPIs, Data analysis.

Compare specifications

Compare features

instantOLAP: 11 Features

Ad-Hoc Analysis
Ad-Hoc Reporting
Automatic Scheduled Reporting
Customizable Dashboard
Customizable Features
Dashboarding
Graphic Benchmark
Issue Indicators
Multy Languages
OLAP
Trend Indicators

MITS Distributor Analytics: 8 Features

Ad-Hoc Analysis
Ad-Hoc Reporting
Automatic Scheduled Reporting
Dashboarding
Issue Indicators
OLAP
Performance Measurements
Trend Indicators
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
instantOLAP
ITQlick rating
3.4/5
Score
50/100
Pricing
4.4/10
License pricing
$550 per license
Functionality
12
Compare
White Cu...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
75/100
Pricing
4.2/10
License pricing
$10,000 per license
Functionality
19
Logikcull
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
$395 per matter/month
Functionality
24
Stimulsoft
ITQlick rating
3.2/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
4.8/10
License pricing
$799.95 per year
Functionality
3
Zoho Ana...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$24 per 2 users/month
Functionality
22

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.