Compare INTERAC and Foundation - Sep 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Sep 24, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - INTERAC or Foundation?

Foundation is more expensive to implement (TCO) than INTERAC, and Foundation is rated higher (93/100) than INTERAC (80/100). INTERAC offers users more features (7) than Foundation (3).

Looking for the right Patient portal solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Intersoft Systems, Inc. Vs. Foundation Software

Intersoft Systems, Inc.: Intersoft Systems, Inc. was launched in 1982 with the acquisition of a suite of accounting applications, and an established user base. With systems tailored for the construction industry, general business, and public accounting firms, Intersoft continues building on this solid base.

Foundation Software: Established in 1985, Foundation Software is the author and developer of America's #1 construction accounting software, FOUNDATION for Windows. Our dedicated staff of professionals has assisted thousands of construction companies across America with the improvement of their businesses’ accounting, job costing, and financial management.One of the ...

Who is more expensive? INTERAC or Foundation?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Patient portal software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for INTERAC and Foundation.

INTERAC accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 INTERAC is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Patient portal software. Foundation accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 INTERAC is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Patient portal software.

Bottom line: Foundation is more expensive than INTERAC.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared INTERAC Vs. Foundation based on some of the most important and required Patient portal features.

INTERAC: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & Forecasting, Purchase Orders, Construction, Payroll Tax Management.

Foundation: Document Management, Scheduling, Costing.

Target customer size

INTERAC's typical customers include: SMBs, Since it’s for the construction industry, it’s an ideal choice for contractors.



INTERAC

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

INTERAC is an accounting software that integrates accounting and management into businesses. The software can be tailored to one business, and it integrates tightly to enable users to enter information only onc...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & CPM, Core Accounting.

Foundation

ITQlick rating
(4.2/5)

FOUNDATION software is construction accounting that incorporates job costing, scheduling, and project management tools and that is deployed through on-premise or through the cloud. This platform provides numero...

Categories: Concrete Cost Estimating, Construction Accounting & Job Costing, Construction Apps, Construction Project Scheduling, Electrician Apps.

Compare specifications

Compare features

INTERAC: 7 Features

Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Billing & Invoicing
Budgeting & Forecasting
Purchase Orders
Construction
Payroll Tax Management

Foundation: 3 Features

Document Management
Scheduling
Costing
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
INTERAC
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
80/100
Pricing
3.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
16
Compare
Foundation
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
8.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
17
Sage 100...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$115 per user/month
Functionality
11
Sage 100...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
87/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$115 per user/month
Functionality
33
The Cons...
ITQlick rating
3.4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
6.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
6

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.