Compare Proactis and Global Trade - Dec 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Proactis or Global Trade?

Global Trade is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Proactis, and Global Trade is rated with the same score (85/100) as Proactis (85/100). Proactis offers users more features (5) than Global Trade (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Proactis!

Looking for the right Supply Chain solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Intesource Vs. AMBER ROAD

Intesource: Companies are caught between two opposing goals: drive cost savings or invest in innovation. Both require people, technology, and expertise in a time when resources – and the skills and time required to source effectively – are scarce. Intesource eliminates operational headaches from the sourcing equation by offering the industry’s only enterpri...

AMBER ROAD: Amber Road is the world's leading provider of on-demand Global Trade Management (GTM) software and solutions. The company currently has over 15,000 global users in a variety of industries, including 3PLs, ocean carriers, brokers, manufacturers, retailers, and high technology companies.

Who is more expensive? Proactis or Global Trade Management?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Supply Chain software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Proactis and Global Trade Management.

Proactis accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Intesource is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Supply Chain software. Global Trade Management accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Intesource is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Supply Chain software.

Bottom line: Global Trade Management is more expensive than Proactis.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Proactis Vs. Global Trade based on some of the most important and required Supply Chain features.

Proactis: Auction Management, Supplier Compliance, Supplier Risk Management, Procurement, Contract Management.

Global Trade Management: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

The software is a useful solution for businesses of all sizes and a variety of types. and Global Trade Management's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.