Compare kiteworks and Stantive Technologies - Aug 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Aug 24, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - kiteworks or Stantive Technologies?

Stantive Technologies is more expensive to implement (TCO) than kiteworks, and kiteworks is rated higher (83/100) than Stantive Technologies (62/100). kiteworks offers users more features (7) than Stantive Technologies (4). There is a clear winner in this case and it is kiteworks!

Looking for the right Content Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Accellion Vs. Stantive Technologies Group

Accellion: Accellion, Inc provides enterprise-class secure mobile file sharing solutions that provide the ease-of-use employees need, while giving the enterprise organization the security protection it needs. More than 1,700 enterprise organizations, representing more than ten million business users worldwide rely on Accellion solutions to help keep their ent...

Stantive Technologies Group: Stantive OrchestraCMS is the only content and digital experience platform built 100% native on Salesforce. OrchestraCMS helps Salesforce customers create compelling digital experiences for their customers, partners, and employees; uniquely combining content with business data, processes and applications across any channel or device.

Who is more expensive? kiteworks or Stantive Technologies?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Content Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for kiteworks and Stantive Technologies.

kiteworks price starts at $15 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 kiteworks is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Content Management software. Stantive Technologies accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 kiteworks is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Content Management software.

Bottom line: Stantive Technologies is more expensive than kiteworks.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared kiteworks Vs. Stantive Technologies based on some of the most important and required Content Management features.

kiteworks: Version Control, Collaboration, Document Management, Task Management, Project Management, Project Collaboration, Content Management.

Stantive Technologies: Customizable Categories, Version Control, Document Indexing, Content Management.

Target customer size

kiteworks's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Stantive Technologies's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

kiteworks

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

starts at $15 per user/month

Kiteworks is a cloud-based content management software that allows managers to handle 3rd party Communications across the enterprise, email, and file transfer protocols.

Categories: Content Management, Document Management, Website Content Management, Team Collaboration.

Stantive Technologies

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

Stantive Technologies is an award-winning cloud-based Content Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Stantive Technologies received a rating of 5 from ITQlick team...

Categories: Text mining, Content Management, Document Management, Website Content Management, Image editing.

Compare specifications

Compare features

kiteworks: 7 Features

Version Control
Collaboration
Document Management
Task Management
Project Management
Project Collaboration
Content Management

Stantive Technologies: 4 Features

Customizable Categories
Version Control
Document Indexing
Content Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
kiteworks
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
83/100
Pricing
3.8/10
License pricing
$15 per user/month
Functionality
15
Compare
Stantive...
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
4.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
11
IZEA
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
$149 per month
Functionality
3
Review
Syndigo
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Drupal
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
87/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
$500 per month
Functionality
8
Review

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.