Compare KOHEZION and Document - Sep 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Sep 23, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - KOHEZION or Document?

Document is more expensive to implement (TCO) than KOHEZION, and KOHEZION is rated higher (90/100) than Document (76/100). Document offers users more features (27) than KOHEZION (0).

Looking for the right Application Development solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

TGMT Systems Inc. Vs. FileHold Systems Inc.

TGMT Systems Inc.: Founded in 1998 by a small group of seasoned developers and graphic designers, TGMT Systems Inc, based in Quebec, Canada, is the creator of popular web based project management software solutions, such as Bug-Track.com. Often working with project managers in the implementation of our other solutions, we recognized the need for an easy to learn a...

FileHold Systems Inc.: Document management software from FileHold Systems is the Microsoft; .NET based, fast track to the “Paperless Office”. FileHold document management software can turn cabinets of paper or desktops of electronic information into an organized, searchable electronic library. Users can securely access their documents via the web or from Microsoft Office...

Who is more expensive? KOHEZION or Document Management software?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Application Development software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for KOHEZION and Document Management software.

KOHEZION price starts at $125 per 5 users/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 KOHEZION is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Development software. Document Management software price starts at $750 per user/year , When comparing Document Management software to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Application Development software cost.

Bottom line: Document Management software is more expensive than KOHEZION.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared KOHEZION Vs. Document based on some of the most important and required Application Development features.

KOHEZION: We are still working to collect the list of features for KOHEZION.

Document Management software: Access and retrieval from anywhere, API Availability, Archiving and Retention, Automated Version Control, Collaboration Management.

Target customer size

Customers of the software mainly consist of small and medium businesses. Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a wide range of types.



KOHEZION

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $125 per 5 users/month

KOHEZION is a data management software which enables the user to create their own web-based application with little no programming requirements. It is built for small and medium businesses.

Categories: Document Management, Web Collaboration.

Document

ITQlick rating
(3.8/5)

starts at $750 per user/year

FileHold is a document management solution for businesses of all sizes. Its capabilities include version control, metadata management, audit tracking, document linking, and others. The software was desig...

Categories: Document Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

KOHEZION: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

Document Management software: 27 Features

Access and retrieval from anywhere
API Availability
Archiving and Retention
Automated Version Control
Collaboration Management
Compliant With HIPAA
Compliant With ISO
Compliant with SEC
Compliant With SOX
Custom User Interface
Document Check-In/Check-Out
Document Comparison
Document Indexing
Document Publishing
Document Tagging
Document Versioning
Edits Tracking
Full Text Searching
Functions with e-Mail Systems
GUI Business Process
Integration with Office
Integration with Outlook
Mobile Access
Remote Document Access
Search by Metadata
User Access Controls
Version Rollback
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
KOHEZION
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
4.6/10
License pricing
$125 per 5 users/month
Functionality
3
Compare
Document
ITQlick rating
3.8/5
Score
76/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
$750 per user/year
Functionality
28
Stackify
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
$35 per server/month
Functionality
14
GitHub
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$4 per user/month
Functionality
16
Review
Anypoint...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
$80,000 per year
Functionality
3

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.