Compare KPA HR and ProfileXT - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - KPA HR or ProfileXT?

KPA HR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than ProfileXT, and ProfileXT is rated with the same score (92/100) as KPA HR (92/100).

Looking for the right Human Resources solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

KPA Vs. Profiles International

KPA: KPA delivers Environmental Health & Safety, HR Management and F&I Compliance programs that help our clients achieve regulatory compliance, control risk, protect their assets and effectively manage people through a combination of innovative software, award winning training and on-site consulting.

Profiles International: We provide assessment solutions that help organizations select the right people for the right job and develop them to their full potential. We assist clients throughout all phases of the employee life cycle to enhance the productivity and performance of individuals, teams, and organizations.

Who is more expensive? KPA HR or ProfileXT?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Human Resources software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for KPA HR and ProfileXT.

KPA HR accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 KPA Human Resource Manager is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Human Resources software. ProfileXT accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 KPA Human Resource Manager is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Human Resources software.

Bottom line: KPA HR is more expensive than ProfileXT.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared KPA HR Vs. ProfileXT based on some of the most important and required Human Resources features.

KPA HR: We are still working to collect the list of features for KPA HR.

ProfileXT: We are still working to collect the list of features for ProfileXT.

Target customer size

KPA HR's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, The software is a viable product for businesses of all sizes with background in a variety of industries.