Compare MaximEyes and ifa EMR - Nov 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - MaximEyes or ifa EMR?
ifa EMR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than MaximEyes, and ifa EMR is rated higher (75/100) than MaximEyes (73/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Optometry solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
First Insight Vs. ifa systems AG
First Insight: Since 1994, we have focused on seeing eye care through the customers lens. Our secure solutions are shaped by a unique customer feedback loop that solicits your input at every point of care. The result is an expert staff and a family of solutions dedicated to improving the patient-provider experience.
ifa systems AG: The free float of the 2,500,000 shares is approx. 48.4%, the majority of 51.6% is held by the management and team members. The international headquarters of ifa systems AG is based in Frechen/Cologne, Germany. The company offers IT solutions for eye care specialists worldwide. The IT-product range: EMR (electronic medical records), scheduling, ...
Who is more expensive? MaximEyes or ifa EMR?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Optometry software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for MaximEyes and ifa EMR.
MaximEyes accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 MaximEyes is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Optometry software. ifa EMR accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 MaximEyes is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Optometry software.
Bottom line: ifa EMR is more expensive than MaximEyes.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared MaximEyes Vs. ifa EMR based on some of the most important and required Optometry features.
MaximEyes: Compliance , Medical, Medical.
ifa EMR: Charting, Medical, Medical.
Target customer size
MaximEyes's typical customers include: Small businesses and start ups, Customers of the software include small and medium practices as well as large businesses.
Compare specifications
MaximEyes Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 73/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Optometry -> MaximEyes review |
Company: | First Insight |
Typical customers: | Small businesses and start ups |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | MaximEyes review, MaximEyes pricing, MaximEyes alternatives |
ifa EMR Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 75/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Medical -> ifa EMR review |
Company: | ifa systems AG |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | ifa EMR review, ifa EMR pricing, ifa EMR alternatives |
Compare features
MaximEyes: 3 Features
ifa EMR: 3 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.