Compare Maximo and FieldAware - Feb 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 28, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Maximo or FieldAware?

Maximo is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FieldAware, and Maximo is rated higher (92/100) than FieldAware (78/100). FieldAware offers users more features (22) than Maximo (3).

Looking for the right Maintenance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

projetech Vs. FieldAware

projetech: Projetech, an IBM Premier Business Partner, provides solutions to maintenance and reliability professionals. Maximo® as a Service, our cloud hosting solution, provides an economical and secure alternative to hosting Maximo® in-house. Our goal is to take the maintenance and overhead associated with supporting the application away from you so you c...

FieldAware: We are re-shaping the field service industry! Our made-for-mobile, cloud-based software was designed from the ground up to provide ease of use with incredible flexibility – a combination that enables field service organizations to amaze their customers, astonish the staff and surprise the competition. Our software was architected as a mobile platfo...

Who is more expensive? Maximo or FieldAware Field Service Automation?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Maintenance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Maximo and FieldAware Field Service Automation.

Maximo price starts at $164 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Maximo is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Maintenance software. FieldAware Field Service Automation price starts at $70 per month , When comparing FieldAware Field Service Automation to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Maintenance software cost.

Bottom line: Maximo is more expensive than FieldAware Field Service Automation.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Maximo Vs. FieldAware based on some of the most important and required Maintenance features.

Maximo: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

FieldAware Field Service Automation: Asset Management, Custom User Interface, Customizable Fields, Customizable Functionality, Customizable Reports.

Target customer size

Maximo Maintenance software serves a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, energy, transportation, utilities, facilities management, and more. FieldAware is focused on solutions in the field service industry and is scalable to address any business size.



Maximo

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

starts at $164 per user/month

Maximo as a Service is a cloud-based SaaS model that provides infrastructure, support, and maintenance for the user of Maximo solution. It removes the overhead cost as well as other expense associated with supp...

Categories: Fixed Asset Management, CMMS, .

FieldAware

ITQlick rating
(3.6/5)

starts at $70 per month

FieldAware Field Service Automation is a cloud-based field service management solution that is developed to be used by individuals as well as by businesses that are of any size starting from small-sized busines...

Categories: Complaint Management, Customer Loyalty, Small Business CRM, Field Service, Field Service - HVAC.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Maximo: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support

FieldAware Field Service Automation: 22 Features

Asset Management
Custom User Interface
Customizable Fields
Customizable Functionality
Customizable Reports
Inventory Management
Lease Administration
Asset Management
Calendar Management
Custom User Interface
Customizable Fields
Customizable Functionality
Customizable Reports
Inventory Management
Lease Administration
Maintenance Management
Maintenance Scheduling
Mobile Access
Multiple Locations
Reporting & Analytics
Work Order Management
Work Order Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Maximo
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
4.4/10
License pricing
$164 per user/month
Functionality
6
Review
Compare
FieldAwa...
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
78/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
$70 per month
Functionality
55
FTMainte...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$40 per month
Functionality
32
UpKeep
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$45 per user/month
Functionality
19
Review
Fiix
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
$45 per user/month
Functionality
30
Review

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.