Compare McCormick and FACS Project Controller - Aug 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - McCormick or FACS Project Controller?

FACS Project Controller is more expensive to implement (TCO) than McCormick, and McCormick is rated higher (89/100) than FACS Project Controller (86/100). FACS Project Controller offers users more features (10) than McCormick (8).

Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

McCormick Vs. Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC

McCormick: McCormick Brings Passion to Flavor™nSince 1889, McCormick has been the Company to turn to for flavor expertise. Today the world relies on our treasured consumer brands, trusted ingredients and culinary know-how.nnRetail outlets, food manufacturers and food service businesses - they all depend on our spices, seasonings and flavorings. McCormick i...

Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC : Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC (FACS) is the leading provider of cloud-based, Field Information Management Solutions for the AEC industry. The company specializes in leveraging the latest advances in wireless and tablet technologies to provide practical, user friendly solutions for industry professionals who aim to deliver construction ...

Who is more expensive? McCormick or FACS Project Controller?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for McCormick and FACS Project Controller.

McCormick accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 McCormick is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Construction software. FACS Project Controller accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 McCormick is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Construction software.

Bottom line: McCormick cost is around the same cost of FACS Project Controller.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared McCormick Vs. FACS Project Controller based on some of the most important and required Construction features.

McCormick: Accounting Management, Bidding, Change Orders, Cost Management, Estimating, Project Management, Scheduling, Service Management.

FACS Project Controller: Document Management, Contract Management, Cost Management, Document Management, Scheduling.

Target customer size

The McCormick software is used best for commercial, industrial, and residential electrical contractors. FACS Project Controller is best for large enterprises and small to medium business in the AEC (architecture, engineering, and construction) industry.