Compare McKesson Practice Choice and Practice fusion - Feb 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 17, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - McKesson Practice Choice or Practice fusion?

McKesson Practice Choice is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Practice fusion, and Practice fusion is rated higher (99/100) than McKesson Practice Choice (85/100). Practice fusion offers users more features (12) than McKesson Practice Choice (6). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Practice fusion!

Looking for the right Practice Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

McKesson Corporation Vs. practice fusion

McKesson Corporation: McKesson is in business for better health. As a company working with health care stakeholders in every setting, we are charting the course toward a stronger, more sustainable future for the entire industry. As the oldest and largest health care services company in the nation, McKesson plays an integral role in health care and has a unique vision...

practice fusion: Our implementation specialists are here to give you as much personal guidance as your practice needs to successfully start using your new EHR.

Who is more expensive? McKesson Practice Choice or Practice fusion?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Practice Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for McKesson Practice Choice and Practice fusion.

McKesson Practice Choice price starts at $249 per provider/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 McKesson Practice Choice is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Practice Management software. Practice fusion price starts at $149 per provider/month , When comparing Practice fusion to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Practice Management software cost.

Bottom line: McKesson Practice Choice is more expensive than Practice fusion.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared McKesson Practice Choice Vs. Practice fusion based on some of the most important and required Practice Management features.

McKesson Practice Choice: Appointment Management, E-Prescribing, E/M Coding, HIPAA Compliant, Patient portal, Voice Recognition.

Practice fusion: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Appointment Management, Charting.

Target customer size

The software is a most viable product for small and medium medical businesses and practices.

Practice Fusion Medical Software serves a wide range of healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and specialists such as dermatologists, psychiatrists, and oncologists.

McKesson Practice Choice

ITQlick rating
(3.5/5)

starts at $249 per provider/month

McKesson Practice Choice is a web based EMR and practice management solution for small and medium businesses. It offers such capabilities as scheduling and accounting, appointment management, patient portal, an...

Categories: Medical, Cloud Based EMR, E-Prescribing, Electronic Medical Records.

Practice fusion

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $149 per provider/month

Practice Fusion is a medical practice management and EHR solution for medical practices of all sizes. The software offers a variety of electronic health record solutions along with practice management features....

Categories: Self-Service Portal, Medical, Allergy EMR, Cardiology EMR, CCHIT Certified EMR / EHR.

Compare specifications

Compare features

McKesson Practice Choice: 6 Features

Appointment Management
E-Prescribing
E/M Coding
HIPAA Compliant
Patient portal
Voice Recognition

Practice fusion: 12 Features

Basic Reports
Data Import/Export
Online Customer Support
Appointment Management
Charting
E-Prescribing
HIPAA Compliant
Medication history
Patient portal
Voice Recognition
Medical
Medical
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
McKesson...
ITQlick rating
3.5/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$249 per provider/month
Functionality
26
Compare
Practice...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$149 per provider/month
Functionality
41
CareClou...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
95/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$349 per provider/month
Functionality
29
MDConnection
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
2.4/10
License pricing
$199 per provider/month
Functionality
30
Intergy ...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
22

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.